You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I guess solving #81 introduce a more serious bug when using split type existence with signed.hash = TRUE. The sign of the hashed feature might not be consistent. (test case required!)
Due to the design of the internal structure, I am wondering if we will degenerate to wontfix#81. In my opinion, the #81 should not affect the accuracy of the model, so it is less important. But this bug might affect the accuracy.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I guess solving #81 introduce a more serious bug when using split type
existence
withsigned.hash = TRUE
. The sign of the hashed feature might not be consistent. (test case required!)Due to the design of the internal structure, I am wondering if we will degenerate to
wontfix
#81. In my opinion, the #81 should not affect the accuracy of the model, so it is less important. But this bug might affect the accuracy.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: