You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Since the package do a lot more than caching (it reduce filesize of final pdf)
it is a bit of a pity that the name represents only half of the possibilities
To attracted even more users and make it better/easier to find, maybe one should think about rethinking the name (your package is is still young / seems to be relatively new on dante :-)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Well, it started out as a way to make compilation of larger documents a lot faster, that's why it's named graphicscache. The DPI scaling options came a lot later.
What do you think would be a better name?
(All in all I think the name is not that critical... A lot of the popular LaTeX packages have really strange names :D)
just to look at it from another perspective:
If you really decide to make it possible to use external tools to optimize the images further in a hq way (like discussed in #15)
maybe it can make sense to split the functions to 2 packages:
one doing the caching part keeping the name "graphicscache" and
a second package depending on "graphicscache" but extending it with the image optimizing function, which could be named something with "optimization" or "size" in it...
Since the package do a lot more than caching (it reduce filesize of final pdf)
it is a bit of a pity that the name represents only half of the possibilities
To attracted even more users and make it better/easier to find, maybe one should think about rethinking the name (your package is is still young / seems to be relatively new on dante :-)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: