You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 21, 2019. It is now read-only.
This works fine as long as RDF/XML is supported by the server. However, if the server only serves Turtle or NTriples, the server will answer to that with HTML before a RDF serialization.
RDF/XML is no longer supported by all servers out there so I would propose to give Turtle and NTriples a higher priority than HTML to make sure we get RDF back if it is supported by the server.
Redland is still quite popular so I would like to know if we do something wrong or if Redland needs to adjust its request. I'm a bit lost here, maybe @retog could have a look at that and compare it with content-negotiation specs?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
put supported media-types of the endpoint into the config, if HTML has a higher (or equal) q-value than all of the supported types, return HTML
Other solution:
if text/html has a q-value of 1, return HTML
else, send HEAD request to SPARQL endpoint with unmodified accept header. If the value of the content-type header of the response is media type of a higher q-value than HTML, do non-html processing. Otherwise do HTML processing
Currently one does not get any triples back from Trifid-LD when using
rapper
from Redland RDF Libraries. I filed an issue for rapper: http://bugs.librdf.org/mantis/view.php?id=590 (text taken from there):Rapper currently (2.0.14) seems to send the following Accept header:
This works fine as long as RDF/XML is supported by the server. However, if the server only serves Turtle or NTriples, the server will answer to that with HTML before a RDF serialization.
RDF/XML is no longer supported by all servers out there so I would propose to give Turtle and NTriples a higher priority than HTML to make sure we get RDF back if it is supported by the server.
Dave answered with a question:
Redland is still quite popular so I would like to know if we do something wrong or if Redland needs to adjust its request. I'm a bit lost here, maybe @retog could have a look at that and compare it with content-negotiation specs?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: