You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Zig package manager has been merged for a while, as for this project, I suggest we add a new option module: bool to indicate whether it has module support, something like this:
{
"author": "vrischmann",
"tags": [
"database"
],
"git": "https://github.com/vrischmann/zig-sqlite",
"root_file": "/sqlite.zig",
"description": "zig-sqlite is a small wrapper around sqlite's C API, making it easier to use with Zig. ",
"license": "mit",
"updated_at": "2023-01-28T06:15:38Z",
"homepage": """module": false// newly add field
}
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Perhaps it will be a point in time issue, and before long all maintained zig packages will have official package manager support. In that case the flag might be redundant.
After 0.11 is released, it might be reasonable to require all packages on this list to support being a "module", and remove the ones that do not as un-maintained. This would also make adding the flag unnecessary after that point.
Personally, I'm hoping all packages will adopt the official packaging system.
Not sure if a module field is enough. That has to be actively maintained and i honestly don't have the time to periodically check each project listed here if they support modules. If we now introduce this, someone has to maintain that field
Zig package manager has been merged for a while, as for this project, I suggest we add a new option
module: bool
to indicate whether it has module support, something like this:The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: