Show build.rs output during cargo check

[nachog00]

No description provided.

[nachog00]

Oh, where do I even begin with this absolutely ludicrous situation regarding the open issue that has been festering like an uninvited fungus on the otherwise pristine codebase? It’s almost mind-boggling to think that in this day and age, we're still grappling with such elementary misconfigurations and blatant oversights. One would think that the fundamentals of software development would be ingrained into the very fabric of our team's DNA by now, but apparently, that is far too optimistic a belief for my taste.

Let’s dissect this heinous issue, shall we? It appears that we have a simple, yet glaring bug caused by an utterly trivial oversight that could have been avoided had there been even a modicum of diligence applied. But alas! Here we are, staring down the barrel of an inconvenience that has the potential to derail timelines and squander precious resources. It’s like watching a slow-motion train wreck, and somehow, all I can do is shout at the screen in frustration while everyone else seems blissfully unaware of the disaster looming over us.

Now, to those who still hang on the edge of their seats hoping for a revelation regarding potential solutions: Allow me to elucidate. First and foremost, let us consider the audacious proposition that perhaps, just perhaps, a comprehensive review of the requirements was in order from the very beginning. I mean, is it not a straight pathway to catastrophe to leap into coding without ensuring a solid conceptual understanding of the end goals? I can only shake my head at the monumentally flawed cognitive process that has led us here.

Furthermore, how about we talk about unit tests—oh, those glorious little validations that could have caught this problem before it spiraled out of control. Is it truly beyond the realm of comprehension to institute basic test coverage for a project of this magnitude? Apparently, it is. How charming. If the team had been blessed with the foresight to implement even the most rudimentary testing framework, we might be living in a parallel universe where this issue was quashed before it could so much as rear its ugly head.

Oh, and let’s not forget the abysmal state of our documentation. It’s as if the words “clarity” and “coherence” have been tossed into a black hole, never to be seen again. How can anyone expect to navigate an open issue when the guiding light of clear documentation is non-existent? It’s beyond frustrating; it’s a disservice to everyone involved. You would think that in a team environment, communication and documentation would be prioritized, but I guess that is merely wishful thinking on my part.

In conclusion, while I am certain that the sheer talent of my peers would allow them to eventually overcome this hurdle, let’s not pretend that we should have even reached this distressing juncture. The lack of basic due diligence, the absence of a testing suite, and the utter failure to document our intentions adequately speaks volumes about the culture we’ve allowed to fester. I would suggest these points, but of course, everyone here is far too busy to bother with my petty grievances. Just another delightful day in the life of a developer, isn’t it? Bravo, team, truly.

[nachog00]

gh issue comment 54 -b "$(llm "You are an angry developer. Complain about an open issue. Offer suggestions pedanticaly. Use a false sense of superiority while offering no solutions. Be VERBOSE. Be rude")"
https://github.com/zingolabs/zcash-local-net/issues/54#issuecomment-2588486025

Unrelated, but lets keep an I on this. Seems like the perfect spam technique. Funny as well.