Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DOCS-379 Application name correction #654

Merged
merged 12 commits into from
Feb 7, 2024

Conversation

Chr1st0ph3rTurn3r
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

MichaelBaj
MichaelBaj previously approved these changes Jan 2, 2024
jamesesilvia
jamesesilvia previously approved these changes Jan 2, 2024
#### Update for SSR version 5.0

Starting with SSR version 5.0, a FIB entry is no longer installed as part of DPI. Instead, domain-names and IP addresses are learned from TLS and mapped to hierarchical services using the `domain-name` field.
About a third of the way through the output you can see that the *Common Name* (listed as `CN` in the `Subject` line) is `www.example.com`. This is what SSR will parse and subsequently retain as the domain-name for this destination. Domain-names and IP addresses are learned from TLS and mapped to hierarchical services using the `domain-name` field.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

output you can see that the Common Name (listed as CN in the Subject line) is www.example.com.

This is actually no longer true since we switch to using SNI from Client certs years ago. We should re-write this section to reflect that.

…ted topics (sorta related, they had the same name, and relate to App ID).
@Chr1st0ph3rTurn3r Chr1st0ph3rTurn3r merged commit 3f1d1db into master Feb 7, 2024
1 check passed
@Chr1st0ph3rTurn3r Chr1st0ph3rTurn3r deleted the DOCS-379-valid-app-names branch February 7, 2024 14:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants