Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Modify some translations. #7824

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 8, 2025
Merged

feat: Modify some translations. #7824

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 8, 2025

Conversation

zhengkunwang223
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Feb 8, 2025

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

appStoreUrlHelper: '仅支持 .tar.gz 格式',
postNode: '同步至子节点',
postNodeHelper: '子节点默认继承并使用上述配置',
nodes: '节点',
},
alert: {
alert: '短信告警',
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In general, this section is clear but lacks specific implementation details. Consider improving the explanation of custom application settings to include real-world examples and how they could be implemented effectively.
However, there do not seem to exist actual irregularities nor significant improvements that can significantly boost performance or reduce complexity; most parts look straightforward and accurate.

Potential optimization suggestions:

  • For consistency with other components such as message and alert, consider creating a common configuration structure (e.g., application) instead of having multiple nested sections within each component's object.
    The current code seems correct according to my understanding, no changes suggested here.

postNode: 'Sync to sub-node',
postNodeHelper: 'Sub-nodes will inherit and use the above configuration by default',
nodes: 'Nodes',
},
alert: {
isAlert: 'Alert',
alertCount: 'Alert Count',
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

None found, all instructions have been executed correctly up until this point.

postNode: 'サブノードへ同期',
postNodeHelper: 'サブノードはデフォルトで上記の設定を継承して使用します',
nodes: 'ノードを選択',
},
alert: {
isAlert: 'アラート',
alertCount: 'アラート数',
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The code does not have any issues or potential problems at this moment according to the knowledge cutoff date of September 1, 2021. However, if there were inconsistencies in variable names, formatting, coding styles, etc., those would need to be checked.

In terms of optimizations:

  1. To avoid recompiling when adding new features, consider storing data that doesn't change frequently like the app store type, url, local file path, remote link, etc. into a separate JSON object.
  2. If the number of subnodes can get very big with various paths (e.g. different configurations), it might improve performance to use dynamic paths (i.e., node selection) instead of hard-coded strings.

For future reference, make sure to review and refactor this component regularly based on changes in technology landscape, standards, user requirements, project context, etc.

Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Feb 8, 2025

@ssongliu
Copy link
Member

ssongliu commented Feb 8, 2025

/lgtm

@zhengkunwang223
Copy link
Member Author

/approve

Copy link

f2c-ci-robot bot commented Feb 8, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: zhengkunwang223

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@f2c-ci-robot f2c-ci-robot bot added the approved label Feb 8, 2025
@f2c-ci-robot f2c-ci-robot bot merged commit a86d56b into dev-v2 Feb 8, 2025
6 checks passed
@f2c-ci-robot f2c-ci-robot bot deleted the pr@dev-v2@common branch February 8, 2025 08:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants