-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 60
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Make collection iterators fulfill LegacyInputIterator and input_iterator concept #626
Draft
m-fila
wants to merge
12
commits into
AIDASoft:master
Choose a base branch
from
m-fila:upgrade_iterators
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
m-fila
force-pushed
the
upgrade_iterators
branch
from
June 11, 2024 17:31
7117c3f
to
1d0de7b
Compare
tmadlener
reviewed
Jun 11, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I know this is not fully done yet, but I think it would be nice to also document which (classes of) algorithms will be enabled by this (if any).
…d::input_iterators
tmadlener
reviewed
Jun 12, 2024
Co-authored-by: Thomas Madlener <[email protected]>
can you also take a look at |
Thanks for pointing out, I'll check it out later |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
BEGINRELEASENOTES
ENDRELEASENOTES
Fixes: #150, fixes #272
Conflicts: #273
Implement missing features so
CollectionIterators
andMutableCollectionIterators
fulfill the requirements imposed on the C++ iterators (#598). It's expected than not all requirements can be fulfilled as some are in direct conflict with podio design:std::forward_iterator
: pointers and references obtained from an iterator should be valid as range the range is valid, but in podio the iterators behave like 'stashing iterators' -> pointers point to iterator member variable limiting their validity to the lifetime of the iterator.As a consequence the iterators can the podio iterators can be at most LegacyInputIterator and
std::input_iterator
. This PR implements missing features to achieve this.List of changes:
Named requirements:
iterator_category
isstd::input_iterator_tag
Concepts:
std::input_or_output_iterator
std::input_iterator
std::indirectly_readable
andstd::readable
(can dereference bothiterator
andconst iterator
)std::forward_iterator
iterator_concept
to be derived fromstd::forward_iterator_tag
)iterator_concept
isstd::input_iterator_tag
std::input_iterator