Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

H264EncoderNvCodec Fix #288

Closed
wants to merge 7 commits into from
Closed

H264EncoderNvCodec Fix #288

wants to merge 7 commits into from

Conversation

mohammedzakikochargi
Copy link
Collaborator

…tests.

IMPORTANT: All PRs must be linked to an issue (except for extremely trivial and straightforward changes).

Fixes #[Issue]

Description
Made all the H264EncoderNvCodec to use pipeline interface instead of step . As step interface is leading to NvResourceRegister issue.

Precise description of the changes in this pull request

Alternative(s) considered

Have you considered any alternatives? And if so, why have you chosen the approach in this PR?

Type

Type Choose one: (Bug fix | Feature | Documentation | Testing | Other)

Screenshots (if applicable)

Checklist

  • I have read the Contribution Guidelines
  • I have written Unit Tests
  • I have discussed my proposed solution with code owners in the linked issue(s) and we have agreed upon the general approach

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 10, 2023

Test Results Linux-CudaT

    1 files  ±0      1 suites  ±0   10m 23s ⏱️ -1s
385 tests ±0  228 ✔️ ±0  157 💤 ±0  0 ±0 
228 runs  ±0    71 ✔️ ±0  157 💤 ±0  0 ±0 

Results for commit e9c07cc. ± Comparison against base commit abddb05.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 10, 2023

Test Results Windows-cuda

    1 files      1 suites   14m 9s ⏱️
381 tests 287 ✔️ 94 💤 0
287 runs  193 ✔️ 94 💤 0

Results for commit e9c07cc.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 10, 2023

Test Results Linux

    1 files  ±0      1 suites  ±0   10m 21s ⏱️ ±0s
294 tests ±0  226 ✔️ ±0  68 💤 ±0  0 ±0 
226 runs  ±0  158 ✔️ ±0  68 💤 ±0  0 ±0 

Results for commit e9c07cc. ± Comparison against base commit abddb05.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 10, 2023

Test Results Win-nocuda

    1 files  ±0      1 suites  ±0   10m 40s ⏱️ +2s
290 tests ±0  226 ✔️ ±0  64 💤 ±0  0 ±0 
226 runs  ±0  162 ✔️ ±0  64 💤 ±0  0 ±0 

Results for commit e9c07cc. ± Comparison against base commit abddb05.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 11, 2023

Test Results Linux_ARM64

    1 files  ±0      1 suites  ±0   10m 59s ⏱️ ±0s
409 tests ±0  256 ✔️ ±0  153 💤 ±0  0 ±0 
256 runs  ±0  103 ✔️ ±0  153 💤 ±0  0 ±0 

Results for commit 62f046c. ± Comparison against base commit abddb05.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

Copy link
Collaborator

@mraduldubey mraduldubey left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

have we added all files reqd for save or compare ?

BOOST_TEST(fileWriter->init());

fileReader->play(true);
boost::shared_ptr<PipeLine> p;
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

what is the test here

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants