-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: Code scanning alert #1: Arbitrary file access during archive extraction ("Zip Slip") #77
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
…action ("Zip Slip") Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <62310815+github-advanced-security[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Your org has enabled the Graphite merge queue for merging into mainAdd the label “graphite/merge” to the PR and Graphite will automatically add it to the merge queue when it’s ready to merge. You must have a Graphite account and log in to Graphite in order to use the merge queue. Sign up using this link. |
WalkthroughThe changes involve modifications to the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant UnzipFunction
participant PathSanitizer
participant FileSystem
User->>UnzipFunction: Request to unzip file
UnzipFunction->>PathSanitizer: Call sanitizeExtractPath(file.Name)
PathSanitizer-->>UnzipFunction: Return sanitized path or error
alt If error occurs
UnzipFunction-->>User: Return error
else
UnzipFunction->>FileSystem: Rename file to originalDir
FileSystem-->>UnzipFunction: Confirm rename
UnzipFunction-->>User: Return success
end
TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #77 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 36.70% 36.84% +0.13%
==========================================
Files 40 40
Lines 1749 1729 -20
==========================================
- Hits 642 637 -5
+ Misses 980 966 -14
+ Partials 127 126 -1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Files selected for processing (1)
- common/teacmd/editor.go (2 hunks)
Additional context used
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
common/teacmd/editor.go
[warning] 207-207: common/teacmd/editor.go#L207
Added line #L207 was not covered by tests
Additional comments not posted (2)
common/teacmd/editor.go (2)
205-208
: Excellent work on improving the security of the file extraction process!The introduction of the
sanitizeExtractPath
function to sanitize the extraction path, along with the error handling, enhances the robustness and security of the code. This change effectively mitigates potential vulnerabilities that could arise from improper path handling.Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 207-207: common/teacmd/editor.go#L207
Added line #L207 was not covered by tests
241-241
: Good simplification of the renaming operation.Using the sanitized path (
originalDir
) directly in theos.Rename
function call improves the clarity and maintainability of the code. It eliminates the need to reconstruct the path, reducing the chances of introducing path-related bugs or inconsistencies.
originalDir = file.Name | ||
originalDir, err = sanitizeExtractPath(filepath.Dir(targetDir), file.Name) | ||
if err != nil { | ||
return err |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Consider adding test coverage for the error handling path.
The static analysis tool codecov/patch reported that line 207, which is part of the error handling block in the unzipFile
function, is not covered by tests. To ensure the robustness of the code and catch potential issues, it's recommended to add test cases that trigger the error path and verify the expected behavior.
Do you want me to generate a test case for this scenario or open a GitHub issue to track this task?
Tools
GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 207-207: common/teacmd/editor.go#L207
Added line #L207 was not covered by tests
Fixes https://github.com/Argus-Labs/world-cli/security/code-scanning/1
Suggested fixes powered by Copilot Autofix. Review carefully before merging.
Summary by CodeRabbit