Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

(proxy perf improvement) - use uvloop for higher RPS (10%-20% higher RPS) #7662

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 10, 2025

Conversation

ishaan-jaff
Copy link
Contributor

@ishaan-jaff ishaan-jaff commented Jan 10, 2025

(proxy perf improvement) - use uvloop for higher RPS (10%-20% higher RPS)

Relevant issues

#7544

Type

🚄 Infrastructure
✅ Test

Changes

[REQUIRED] Testing - Attach a screenshot of any new tests passing locally

If UI changes, send a screenshot/GIF of working UI fixes

Copy link

vercel bot commented Jan 10, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
litellm ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jan 10, 2025 2:09am

@ishaan-jaff ishaan-jaff merged commit 2507c27 into main Jan 10, 2025
30 of 31 checks passed
@yuxiaolejs
Copy link

Hi @ishaan-jaff,
After this new version was released, my Windows server configuration script stopped working, and complained that uvloop is not supported. Is there a possible way for me to install the new litellm without uvloop? Or I have to use the old version of it because now uvloop is required?

@ishaan-jaff
Copy link
Contributor Author

hi @yuxiaolejs sorry about this, no it is not a required dependency

pushed a fix here: #7677

new release v1.57.7 is coming out ASAP

rajatvig pushed a commit to rajatvig/litellm that referenced this pull request Jan 16, 2025
…r RPS) (BerriAI#7662)

* uvicorn use uvloop

* fix uvloop==0.21.0

* add uvloop to pyproject

* test_completion_response_ratelimit_headers
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants