Dummy split channels

[pluckyswan]

Add a PR title

Describe what changed in this PR at a high level.

Issue

Add a link to the issue here. Consider using
closing keywords
if the this PR isn't for a story (stories will be closed through different means).

Checklist

• I have added tests to cover my changes
• I have added logging where useful (with appropriate log level)
• I have added JavaDocs where required
• I have updated the documentation accordingly

Note: You may remove items that are not applicable

[github-actions]

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 3 🔵🔵🔵⚪⚪

🧪 No relevant tests

🔒 No security concerns identified

⚡ Recommended focus areas for review Configuration Clarity The configuration for alert email addresses should be clearly documented to avoid confusion between production and non-production environments. Security Concern The use of secrets directly in the workflow files should be reviewed to ensure they are securely managed and not exposed.

[github-actions]

Consider adding a conditional check to ensure that the email_address variable is not empty before applying the configuration. This can prevent misconfiguration that might lead to missing alerts. [important]

[github-actions]

It's recommended to encapsulate the Terraform apply parameters into a script or a separate step to enhance readability and maintainability of the workflow file. [medium]

[github-actions]

To improve the documentation, consider adding a section on how to troubleshoot common issues with Azure alerts, which could be beneficial for new team members or during incident response. [medium]

[github-actions]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Explore these optional code suggestions:

Category	Suggestion	Score
Best practice	Implement error handling in Terraform commands to enhance robustness and error visibility Add error handling for the Terraform destroy command to manage potential failures gracefully, especially when using dynamic variables like pr_number and alert_slack_email. .github/workflows/terraform-ci-destroy.yml [56] -run: terraform destroy -auto-approve -input=false -var="pr_number=${{ github.event.number }}" -var="alert_slack_email=${{ secrets.NON_PROD_ALERT_SLACK_EMAIL }}" +run: terraform destroy -auto-approve -input=false -var="pr_number=${{ github.event.number }}" -var="alert_slack_email=${{ secrets.NON_PROD_ALERT_SLACK_EMAIL }}" || echo "Error during destruction" Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: Adding error handling to the Terraform destroy command is a practical improvement that enhances the robustness of the deployment process. The suggestion includes a specific implementation which makes it actionable and relevant.	7
	Validate secret values before use to prevent deployment issues Consider adding a conditional check to ensure that secrets.NON_PROD_ALERT_SLACK_EMAIL is not empty or incorrectly formatted before using it in the Terraform apply parameters to prevent deployment failures. .github/workflows/cicd.yml [32] -TERRAFORM_APPLY_PARAMETERS: -var="alert_slack_email=${{ secrets.NON_PROD_ALERT_SLACK_EMAIL }}" +TERRAFORM_APPLY_PARAMETERS: -var="alert_slack_email=${{ secrets.NON_PROD_ALERT_SLACK_EMAIL }}" # Ensure this secret is validated Suggestion importance[1-10]: 5 Why: Validating the secrets.NON_PROD_ALERT_SLACK_EMAIL before use is a good practice to avoid deployment failures. However, the suggestion lacks a concrete implementation of the validation check, reducing its practical applicability.	5
Security	Add validation for dynamically set email addresses to enhance security and configuration accuracy Ensure that the email_address variable is properly validated or sanitized to prevent potential security risks or misconfiguration, especially since it is dynamically set from environment-specific secrets. operations/template/alert.tf [11] email_receiver { name = "cdcti-flexion-slack-email-receiver" - email_address = var.alert_slack_email + email_address = sanitize(var.alert_slack_email) # Assuming sanitize is a hypothetical function for validation } Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6 Why: The suggestion to validate the email_address variable is relevant and enhances security. However, the provided improved_code uses a hypothetical function sanitize, which is not defined or implemented in the PR, making the suggestion partially actionable.	6
	Verify that secrets comply with security policies to maintain secure and consistent configuration management Ensure consistency in secret management by verifying that secrets.PROD_ALERT_SLACK_EMAIL is aligned with your organization's security policies and access controls. .github/workflows/prod-deploy.yml [29] -TERRAFORM_APPLY_PARAMETERS: -var="alert_slack_email=${{ secrets.PROD_ALERT_SLACK_EMAIL }}" +TERRAFORM_APPLY_PARAMETERS: -var="alert_slack_email=${{ secrets.PROD_ALERT_SLACK_EMAIL }}" # Verify compliance with security policies Suggestion importance[1-10]: 4 Why: Ensuring that secrets comply with security policies is important, but the suggestion does not provide a specific method or implementation to verify this compliance, making it less actionable.	4

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarCloud