Cherry-Pick Eliminate Warning Messages

[jorg3lopez]

Description

Describe what changed in this PR at a high level.

Issue

Add a link to the issue here. Consider using
closing keywords
if the this PR isn't for a story (stories will be closed through different means).

Checklist

• I have added tests to cover my changes
• I have added logging where useful (with appropriate log level)
• I have added JavaDocs where required
• I have updated the documentation accordingly

Note: You may remove items that are not applicable

[github-actions]

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 4 🔵🔵🔵🔵⚪

🧪 No relevant tests

🔒 No security concerns identified

⚡ Recommended focus areas for review Code Duplication There is significant code duplication in the test cases for handling different scenarios of PID and OBR extensions. Consider refactoring to reduce redundancy and improve maintainability. Missing Edge Cases Some edge cases are not covered in the tests for the new methods, such as handling malformed inputs or unexpected data types in extensions.

[github-actions]

Consider using a helper method or parameterized tests to handle repetitive test setups, especially where the only differences are input values or minor configuration changes. This will make the tests easier to read and maintain. [important]

[github-actions]

Ensure that all new methods introduced in the test file have corresponding negative tests that handle unexpected or invalid input gracefully. This is crucial for robustness. [important]

[github-actions]

To improve code clarity and maintainability, consider breaking down complex test methods into smaller, more focused tests. This can help isolate issues and make the tests more understandable. [medium]

[github-actions]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Explore these optional code suggestions:

Category	Suggestion	Score
Possible issue	Add null safety checks to prevent potential NullPointerExceptions Ensure that the HapiHelper.getObr16ExtensionPractitioner(serviceRequest) method call is properly handled for null values before accessing methods on the returned object. etor/src/test/groovy/gov/hhs/cdc/trustedintermediary/etor/ruleengine/transformation/custom/CopyOrcOrderProviderToObrOrderProviderTest.groovy [229-230] def practitioner = HapiHelper.getObr16ExtensionPractitioner(serviceRequest) -def xcnExtension = practitioner.getExtensionByUrl(PRACTITIONER_EXTENSION_URL) +def xcnExtension = practitioner?.getExtensionByUrl(PRACTITIONER_EXTENSION_URL) Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: Adding null safety checks is crucial to prevent runtime exceptions when the practitioner object might be null. This suggestion correctly identifies a potential issue in the code and provides a solution to enhance robustness.	8
	Add null safety checks to prevent potential NullPointerExceptions when accessing patient name details Ensure that the HapiHelper.getPIDPatient(bundle).getNameFirstRep() method call is properly handled for cases where getPIDPatient(bundle) might return null, to avoid NullPointerException. etor/src/test/groovy/gov/hhs/cdc/trustedintermediary/etor/ruleengine/transformation/custom/RemovePatientNameTypeCodeTest.groovy [28-29] -def patientName = HapiHelper.getPIDPatient(bundle).getNameFirstRep() -def patientNameUse = patientName.getUse() +def patient = HapiHelper.getPIDPatient(bundle) +def patientName = patient?.getNameFirstRep() +def patientNameUse = patientName?.getUse() Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: This suggestion is highly relevant as it addresses a common source of bugs (NullPointerException) by adding null checks before accessing methods on potentially null objects. This enhances the code's safety and robustness.	8
	Add a null check for obrExtension to prevent NullPointerException Ensure that the setOBR16WithPractitioner method checks if obrExtension is null before attempting to use it, to prevent potential NullPointerExceptions. shared/src/main/java/gov/hhs/cdc/trustedintermediary/external/hapi/HapiHelper.java [555-565] public static void setOBR16WithPractitioner( Extension obrExtension, PractitionerRole practitionerRole) { - if (practitionerRole == null || !practitionerRole.getPractitioner().hasReference()) { + if (obrExtension == null || practitionerRole == null || !practitionerRole.getPractitioner().hasReference()) { return; } Extension obr16Extension = ensureSubExtensionExists(obrExtension, EXTENSION_OBR16_DATA_TYPE.toString()); obr16Extension.setValue(practitionerRole.getPractitioner()); } Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: Adding a null check for obrExtension in the setOBR16WithPractitioner method is crucial to prevent a NullPointerException if the obrExtension is null when attempting to use it. This enhances the robustness and reliability of the method.	8
	Implement null checks or default values for methods that might return null Verify that the HapiFhirHelper.getPID3_4Value(bundle) and HapiFhirHelper.getPID3_5Value(bundle) methods are correctly implemented to handle cases where the bundle may not contain the expected values, potentially returning null. etor/src/test/groovy/gov/hhs/cdc/trustedintermediary/etor/ruleengine/transformation/custom/RemovePatientIdentifierTest.groovy [38-39] -def actualPid3_4 = HapiFhirHelper.getPID3_4Value(bundle) -def actualPid3_5 = HapiFhirHelper.getPID3_5Value(bundle) +def actualPid3_4 = HapiFhirHelper.getPID3_4Value(bundle) ?: "" +def actualPid3_5 = HapiFhirHelper.getPID3_5Value(bundle) ?: "" Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: The suggestion to handle potential null values from method calls is valid and improves the code's reliability by ensuring that operations on potentially null objects are handled gracefully.	7

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
3 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
95.7% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[jorg3lopez]

Closing to fix the partial signed commit