Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow users to add LLM within the UI #6

Merged
merged 11 commits into from
Apr 6, 2024
Merged

Allow users to add LLM within the UI #6

merged 11 commits into from
Apr 6, 2024

Conversation

trducng
Copy link
Contributor

@trducng trducng commented Apr 3, 2024

image

Provide vanilla ChatOpenAI and AzureChatOpenAI. Rename AzureChatOpenAI to
LCAzureChatOpenAI.

Remove the highest accuracy, lowest cost criteria. These criteria are unnecessary.
The users, not pipeline creators, should choose which LLM to use. Furthermore,
it's cumbersome to input this information, really degrades user experience.

Remove the LLM selection in simple reasoning pipeline.

trducng added 6 commits April 1, 2024 22:29
These criteria are unnecessary. The users, not pipeline creators, should choose
which LLM to use. Furthermore, it's cumbersome to input this information,
really degrades user experience.
@trducng trducng requested a review from lone17 April 3, 2024 07:17
@trducng trducng merged commit a203fc0 into main Apr 6, 2024
1 of 3 checks passed
@trducng trducng deleted the feat/dynamic-llm branch April 6, 2024 10:10
phv2312 pushed a commit to phv2312/kotaemon that referenced this pull request Sep 11, 2024
* Rename AzureChatOpenAI to LCAzureChatOpenAI
* Provide vanilla ChatOpenAI and AzureChatOpenAI
* Remove the highest accuracy, lowest cost criteria

These criteria are unnecessary. The users, not pipeline creators, should choose
which LLM to use. Furthermore, it's cumbersome to input this information,
really degrades user experience.

* Remove the LLM selection in simple reasoning pipeline
* Provide a dedicated stream method to generate the output
* Return placeholder message to chat if the text is empty
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant