Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Low: cts: Don't include the digest in expected output. #3709

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

clumens
Copy link
Contributor

@clumens clumens commented Oct 25, 2024

We are seeing a problem during test builds where the digest can differ. This problem has not been seen when doing builds locally with mock, nor on the clusterlabs CI infrastructure. It additionally does not seem to be a symptom of any other problem, since we've had no reports with weird CIB differing problems.

Note that the digest was not included in the expected output from the moment it was first committed in 2008 until I converted cts-cli.in to python Presumedly, this was originally done because the input CIB would be changing and they didn't also want to have to remember to change the expected output. Unfortunately, this makes it difficult to know if we would have been seeing these digest differences all along.

cts/cts-cli.in Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
We are seeing a problem during test builds where the digest can differ.
This problem has not been seen when doing builds locally with mock, nor
on the clusterlabs CI infrastructure.  It additionally does not seem to
be a symptom of any other problem, since we've had no reports with weird
CIB differing problems.

Note that the digest was not included in the expected output from the
moment it was first committed in 2008 until I converted cts-cli.in to
python.  Presumedly, this was originally done because the input CIB
would be changing and they didn't also want to have to remember to
change the expected output.  Unfortunately, this makes it difficult to
know if we would have been seeing these digest differences all along.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants