MAINT: replace more citation keys with inspire-HEP

ComPWA · May 16, 2024 · 0dc7778 · 0dc7778
1 parent 134047e
commit 0dc7778
Show file tree

Hide file tree

Showing 5 changed files with 9 additions and 9 deletions.
diff --git a/docs/bibliography.bib b/docs/bibliography.bib
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-@article{aitchisonMatrixFormalismOverlapping1972,
+@article{Aitchison:1972ay,
   title = {The 𝐾-Matrix Formalism for Overlapping Resonances},
   author = {Aitchison, I.J.R.},
   year = {1972},
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ @book{Blatt:1952ije
   annotation = {OCLC: 840280777}
 }
 
-@book{bycklingParticleKinematics1973,
+@book{Byckling:1971vca,
   title = {Particle {{Kinematics}}},
   author = {Byckling, Eero and Kajantie, Keijo},
   year = {1973},
@@ -199,7 +199,7 @@ @misc{petersPartialWaveAnalysis2004
   url = {https://slideplayer.com/slide/1676572}
 }
 
-@misc{richmanExperimenterGuideHelicity1984,
+@misc{Richman:1984gh,
   title = {An {{Experimenter}}'s {{Guide}} to the {{Helicity Formalism}}},
   author = {Richman, Jeffrey D.},
   year = {1984},

diff --git a/docs/report/010.ipynb b/docs/report/010.ipynb
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@
     ]
    },
    "source": [
-    "As described in [TR-005](005.ipynb), the $\\boldsymbol{K}$-matrix describes **scattering processes** of the type $cd \\to ab$. The $P$-vector approach is one of two generalizations for **production processes** of the type $c \\to ab$. For more details on this approach, {cite}`Chung:1995dx` refers to {cite}`aitchisonMatrixFormalismOverlapping1972`.\n",
+    "As described in [TR-005](005.ipynb), the $\\boldsymbol{K}$-matrix describes **scattering processes** of the type $cd \\to ab$. The $P$-vector approach is one of two generalizations for **production processes** of the type $c \\to ab$. For more details on this approach, {cite}`Chung:1995dx` refers to {cite}`Aitchison:1972ay`.\n",
     "\n",
     "If we take the production vector $P$ to be:\n",
     "\n",

diff --git a/docs/report/014.ipynb b/docs/report/014.ipynb
@@ -134,7 +134,7 @@
     "\n",
     "[ampform#245](https://github.com/ComPWA/ampform/pull/245) implements spin alignment, which results in large sum combinatorics for all helicity combinations. The result is an amplitude model expression that is too large to be rendered as LaTeX.\n",
     "\n",
-    "To some extend, this is already the case with the [current implementation](https://ampform.readthedocs.io/en/0.12.3/usage/formalism.html) of the 'standard' helicity formalism {cite}`Jacob:1959at, richmanExperimenterGuideHelicity1984, kutschkeAngularDistributionCookbook1996, chungSpinFormalismsUpdated2014`: many of the terms in the total intensity expression differ only by the helicities of the final and initial state."
+    "To some extend, this is already the case with the [current implementation](https://ampform.readthedocs.io/en/0.12.3/usage/formalism.html) of the 'standard' helicity formalism {cite}`Jacob:1959at, Richman:1984gh, kutschkeAngularDistributionCookbook1996, chungSpinFormalismsUpdated2014`: many of the terms in the total intensity expression differ only by the helicities of the final and initial state."
    ]
   },
   {

diff --git a/docs/report/015.ipynb b/docs/report/015.ipynb
@@ -242,7 +242,7 @@
     "![](https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/29308176/164992511-98d8fa79-06dc-40ac-b91c-388ee2fb06f6.svg)\n",
     "\n",
     "<!-- cspell:ignore mikhasenko Dalitzplot Threebody -->\n",
-    "When formulating the amplitude model for this reaction, the {class}`~ampform.helicity.HelicityAmplitudeBuilder` implements the 'standard' helicity formalism as described in {cite}`richmanExperimenterGuideHelicity1984, kutschkeAngularDistributionCookbook1996, chungSpinFormalismsUpdated2014` and simply sums over the different amplitudes to get the full amplitude:"
+    "When formulating the amplitude model for this reaction, the {class}`~ampform.helicity.HelicityAmplitudeBuilder` implements the 'standard' helicity formalism as described in {cite}`Richman:1984gh, kutschkeAngularDistributionCookbook1996, chungSpinFormalismsUpdated2014` and simply sums over the different amplitudes to get the full amplitude:"
    ]
   },
   {

diff --git a/docs/report/017.ipynb b/docs/report/017.ipynb
@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@
     "Kinematics for a three-body decay $0 \\to 123$ can be fully described by two **Mandelstam variables** $\\sigma_1, \\sigma_2$, because the third variable $\\sigma_3$ can be expressed in terms $\\sigma_1, \\sigma_2$, the mass $m_0$ of the initial state, and the masses $m_1, m_2, m_3$ of the final state. As can be seen, the roles of $\\sigma_1, \\sigma_2, \\sigma_3$ are interchangeable.\n",
     "\n",
     "```{margin}\n",
-    "See Eq. (1.2) in {cite}`bycklingParticleKinematics1973`\n",
+    "See Eq. (1.2) in {cite}`Byckling:1971vca`\n",
     "```"
    ]
   },
@@ -173,7 +173,7 @@
     "\n",
     "\n",
     "```{margin}\n",
-    "See §V.2 in {cite}`bycklingParticleKinematics1973`\n",
+    "See §V.2 in {cite}`Byckling:1971vca`\n",
     "```"
    ]
   },
@@ -585,7 +585,7 @@
     "The boundary cannot be parametrized analytically in polar coordinates, but there is a numeric solution. The idea is to solve the condition $\\phi(\\sigma_1,\\sigma_2)=0$ after the following substitutions:\n",
     "\n",
     "```{margin}\n",
-    "See {cite}`bycklingParticleKinematics1973`, pp.&nbsp;109–112\n",
+    "See {cite}`Byckling:1971vca`, pp.&nbsp;109–112\n",
     "```"
    ]
   },