fix(tests): resolve linting issues in test files

[devin-ai-integration]

Comprehensive test suite for ComposioToolSet

Link to Devin run: https://app.devin.ai/sessions/2142c6b5bc4d40a4ad9c4248531541d4

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name	Status	Preview	Comments	Updated (UTC)
composio	❌ Failed (Inspect)			Jan 18, 2025 9:47pm

[entelligence-ai-pr-reviews]

🚀 Code Review Initiated

The review process for this pull request has started. Our system is analyzing the changes for:

• Code quality, performance, and potential issues
• Adherence to project guidelines
• Integration of user-provided learnings

You will receive structured and actionable feedback shortly! ⏳

[devin-ai-integration]

🤖 Devin AI Engineer

I'll be helping with this pull request! Here's what you should know:

✅ I will automatically:

• Address comments on this PR. Add "(aside)" to your comment to have me ignore it.
• Look at CI failures and help fix them

⚙️ Control Options:

• Disable automatic comment and CI monitoring

[github-actions]

This comment was generated by github-actions[bot]!

JS SDK Coverage Report

📊 Coverage report for JS SDK can be found at the following URL:
https://pub-92e668239ab84bfd80ee07d61e9d2f40.r2.dev/coverage-12847689310/coverage/index.html

📁 Test report folder can be found at the following URL:
https://pub-92e668239ab84bfd80ee07d61e9d2f40.r2.dev/html-report-12847689310/html-report/report.html

[shreysingla11]

I've reviewed the test coverage additions for the base toolset. Overall, the test coverage is comprehensive and well-structured. Here's my assessment:

Strengths 👍

1. Comprehensive Coverage

• Core functionality testing
• Edge case handling
• Security testing
• Processor chain testing
• Error handling
• Input/output validation

2. Well-Structured Tests

• Logical test organization
• Clear test descriptions
• Good use of beforeEach/afterEach hooks
• Proper test isolation

3. Security Testing

• Rate limiting tests
• Authentication failure handling
• Permission validation
• Input sanitization
• Output validation

Areas for Improvement 🔧

1. Test Organization
   Consider splitting the large test file into multiple files:

// Suggested structure:
- core/
  - constructor.spec.ts
  - actions.spec.ts
  - entities.spec.ts
- security/
  - authentication.spec.ts
  - permissions.spec.ts
- processors/
  - chain.spec.ts
  - validation.spec.ts

2. Test Helpers
   Add helper functions for common operations:

const createTestAction = async (toolset, name, callback) => {
  return await toolset.createAction({
    actionName: name,
    callback
  });
};

3. Constants
   Extract test constants:

const TEST_CONSTANTS = {
  API_KEY: testConfig.COMPOSIO_API_KEY,
  BASE_URL: testConfig.BACKEND_HERMES_URL,
  DEFAULT_ENTITY: "default"
};

4. Documentation
   Add JSDoc comments for test suites:

/**
 * Tests for ComposioToolSet constructor functionality
 * Verifies initialization, configuration and error handling
 */
describe('constructor', () => {

Potential Issues ⚠️

1. Rate Limiting Tests (lines 1491-1502)

// Could be flaky due to timing
const promises = Array(10).fill(null).map(() => 
  toolset.executeAction({...})
);

Consider adding retry logic or configurable delays.

2. Large Payload Test (lines 1529-1548)

const largeData = Array(1000).fill({ key: "value" });

Consider parameterizing the size for different test environments.

3. Concurrent Execution (lines 1550-1573)

let executionCount = 0;
// Race condition possible
executionCount++;

Consider using atomic operations or locks.

Recommendations 📝

1. Add performance benchmarks for critical operations
2. Add more integration tests between components
3. Consider adding stress tests for concurrent operations
4. Add documentation about test data setup
5. Consider adding snapshot tests for complex responses

Overall, this is a high-quality test suite that significantly improves the reliability of the base toolset. The tests are well-structured and cover critical functionality, though some minor improvements could make it even better.

[shreysingla11]

Consider using atomic operations or a mutex here to prevent race conditions in concurrent tests. The current implementation could lead to flaky tests.

[shreysingla11]

The rate limiting test could be flaky due to timing issues. Consider adding configurable delays or retry logic:

const executeWithRetry = async (action, maxRetries = 3, delay = 1000) => {
  for (let i = 0; i < maxRetries; i++) {
    try {
      return await toolset.executeAction(action);
    } catch (e) {
      if (i === maxRetries - 1) throw e;
      await new Promise(resolve => setTimeout(resolve, delay));
    }
  }
};

[shreysingla11]

Consider parameterizing the payload size for different test environments. This would make the test more flexible and prevent potential memory issues:

const TEST_CONFIG = {
  smallPayload: 100,
  mediumPayload: 1000,
  largePayload: 10000,
};

const size = process.env.TEST_PAYLOAD_SIZE || TEST_CONFIG.mediumPayload;
const largeData = Array(size).fill({ key: "value" });

[shreysingla11]

Consider adding JSDoc comments to describe the test suite and its purpose:

/**
 * Security and Edge Cases Test Suite
 * Tests various security aspects and edge cases of the ComposioToolSet:
 * - Rate limiting behavior
 * - Authentication failures
 * - Permission handling
 * - Large payload processing
 * - Concurrent execution
 * - Input sanitization
 * - Output validation
 */
describe('Security and Edge Cases', () => {

[shreysingla11]

Consider extracting test constants to improve maintainability:

const TEST_CONSTANTS = {
  API: {
    KEY: testConfig.COMPOSIO_API_KEY,
    BASE_URL: testConfig.BACKEND_HERMES_URL,
  },
  RUNTIME: {
    DEFAULT: "composio-ai",
    CUSTOM: "custom-runtime"
  },
  ENTITY: {
    DEFAULT: "default",
    CUSTOM: "custom-entity",
    RESTRICTED: "restricted-entity"
  }
};

[entelligence-ai-pr-reviews]

Rate limiting test doesn't verify the specific rate limit error, should check for 429 status code.

📝 Committable Code Suggestion

‼️ Ensure you review the code suggestion before committing it to the branch. Make sure it replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change

	it("should handle rate limiting", async () => {
	// Simulate rate limiting by making multiple rapid requests
	const promises = Array(10).fill(null).map(() =>
	toolset.executeAction({
	action: "github_issues_create",
	params: { title: "Test Issue" },
	entityId: "default",
	})
	);
	await expect(Promise.all(promises)).rejects.toThrow();
	});
	it("should handle rate limiting", async () => {
	const promises = Array(10).fill(null).map(() =>
	toolset.executeAction({
	action: "github_issues_create",
	params: { title: "Test Issue" },
	entityId: "default",
	})
	);
	await expect(Promise.all(promises)).rejects.toMatchObject({
	status: 429
	});
	});

[entelligence-ai-pr-reviews]

Sanitization test only checks script tags, should test multiple injection patterns.

📝 Committable Code Suggestion

‼️ Ensure you review the code suggestion before committing it to the branch. Make sure it replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change

	it("should sanitize input parameters", async () => {
	const actionName = "input_sanitization_test";
	await toolset.createAction({
	actionName,
	inputParams: z.object({
	text: z.string(),
	}),
	callback: async (params) => ({
	data: { sanitized: params.text },
	successful: true,
	}),
	});
	// Test with potentially malicious input
	const maliciousInput = "<script>alert('xss')</script>";
	const result = await toolset.executeAction({
	action: actionName,
	params: { text: maliciousInput },
	entityId: "default",
	});
	expect(result.data.sanitized).not.toContain("<script>");
	});
	it("should sanitize input parameters", async () => {
	const maliciousInputs = [
	"<script>alert('xss')</script>",
	"<img src='x' onerror='alert(1)'>",
	"javascript:alert(1)",
	"<svg onload='alert(1)'>",
	"<iframe src='javascript:alert(1)'>"
	];
	for (const input of maliciousInputs) {
	const result = await toolset.executeAction({
	action: actionName,
	params: { text: input },
	entityId: "default",
	});
	expect(result.data.sanitized).not.toContain(input);
	expect(result.data.sanitized).not.toMatch(/<[^>]*script|javascript:|on\w+=/i);
	}
	});

[entelligence-ai-pr-reviews]

Concurrent execution test has race condition, should use atomic operations or separate counters.

📝 Committable Code Suggestion

‼️ Ensure you review the code suggestion before committing it to the branch. Make sure it replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change

	it("should handle concurrent execution", async () => {
	const actionName = "concurrent_action";
	let executionCount = 0;
	await toolset.createAction({
	actionName,
	callback: async () => {
	executionCount++;
	return { data: { count: executionCount }, successful: true };
	},
	});
	const promises = Array(5).fill(null).map(() =>
	toolset.executeAction({
	action: actionName,
	params: {},
	entityId: "default",
	})
	);
	const results = await Promise.all(promises);
	expect(results).toHaveLength(5);
	expect(executionCount).toBe(5);
	});
	const executionCount = new Atomic(0);
	await toolset.createAction({
	actionName,
	callback: async () => {
	const count = executionCount.incrementAndGet();
	return { data: { count }, successful: true };
	},
	});

[entelligence-ai-pr-reviews]

The test case for rate limiting is flawed; it assumes rate limiting will always trigger with 10 requests, which is implementation dependent and could be flaky. Use mock/stub instead.

📝 Committable Code Suggestion

‼️ Ensure you review the code suggestion before committing it to the branch. Make sure it replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change

	const promises = Array(10).fill(null).map(() =>
	toolset.executeAction({
	action: "github_issues_create",
	params: { title: "Test Issue" },
	entityId: "default",
	})
	);
	await expect(Promise.all(promises)).rejects.toThrow();
	const rateLimiter = jest.spyOn(toolset, 'executeAction');
	rateLimiter.mockRejectedValueOnce(new Error('Rate limit exceeded'));
	await expect(toolset.executeAction({
	action: "github_issues_create",
	params: { title: "Test Issue" },
	entityId: "default",
	})).rejects.toThrow('Rate limit exceeded');
	rateLimiter.mockRestore();

[entelligence-ai-pr-reviews]

The sanitization test is incomplete; it checks if <script> is removed but doesn't verify other XSS vectors or ensure the sanitization is secure. Test multiple attack vectors.

📝 Committable Code Suggestion

‼️ Ensure you review the code suggestion before committing it to the branch. Make sure it replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change

	const maliciousInput = "<script>alert('xss')</script>";
	const result = await toolset.executeAction({
	action: actionName,
	params: { text: maliciousInput },
	entityId: "default",
	});
	expect(result.data.sanitized).not.toContain("<script>");
	const maliciousInputs = [
	"<script>alert('xss')</script>",
	"<img src='x' onerror='alert(1)'>",
	"javascript:alert(1)",
	"<svg/onload=alert(1)>",
	"<iframe src='javascript:alert(1)'>"
	];
	for (const input of maliciousInputs) {
	const result = await toolset.executeAction({
	action: actionName,
	params: { text: input },
	entityId: "default",
	});
	expect(result.data.sanitized).not.toContain("<script>");
	expect(result.data.sanitized).not.toMatch(/javascript:/i);
	expect(result.data.sanitized).not.toMatch(/on\w+\s*=/i);
	expect(result.data.sanitized).not.toMatch(/<iframe[^>]*>/i);
	}

[entelligence-ai-pr-reviews]

The concurrent execution test has a race condition; it relies on a shared counter that could lead to flaky tests. Use atomic operations or a different verification approach.

📝 Committable Code Suggestion

‼️ Ensure you review the code suggestion before committing it to the branch. Make sure it replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change

	it("should handle concurrent execution", async () => {
	const actionName = "concurrent_action";
	let executionCount = 0;
	await toolset.createAction({
	actionName,
	callback: async () => {
	executionCount++;
	return { data: { count: executionCount }, successful: true };
	},
	});
	const promises = Array(5).fill(null).map(() =>
	toolset.executeAction({
	action: actionName,
	params: {},
	entityId: "default",
	})
	);
	const results = await Promise.all(promises);
	expect(results).toHaveLength(5);
	expect(executionCount).toBe(5);
	});
	const atomicCounter = new Int32Array(new SharedArrayBuffer(4));
	await toolset.createAction({
	actionName,
	callback: async () => {
	Atomics.add(atomicCounter, 0, 1);
	return { data: { count: AtomicCounter.load(atomicCounter, 0) }, successful: true };
	},
	});
	const promises = Array(5).fill(null).map(() =>
	toolset.executeAction({
	action: actionName,
	params: {},
	entityId: "default",
	})
	);
	const results = await Promise.all(promises);
	expect(results).toHaveLength(5);
	expect(Atomics.load(atomicCounter, 0)).toBe(5);

[entelligence-ai-pr-reviews]

Missing import for getTestConfig causes runtime errors. Import or define the function.

📝 Committable Code Suggestion

‼️ Ensure you review the code suggestion before committing it to the branch. Make sure it replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change

	let toolset: ComposioToolSet;
	const testConfig = getTestConfig();
	import { getTestConfig } from './config';
	let toolset: ComposioToolSet;
	const testConfig = getTestConfig();

[devin-ai-integration]

Devin is currently unreachable - the session may have died.

[devin-ai-integration]

Closing due to inactivity.