You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have recently run sqanti3 with fasta as input, and the result table contains some duplicate isoforms.
I had a quick check and found it stems from the corrected.gtf file first, which seems been generated after aligning with minimap2, the isoform is splitted because of supplement alignment.
I did not find much detail about that, could you explain a bit? Does it make sense to consider them separately, because sometimes the dup is far away say in a different chromosome, but sometimes quite close.
I can give an example here:
In same chromosome (430kb apart)
Cross chromosome:
Cheers,
Alex
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I am not sure why this is happening (SQANTI3 runs minimap2 with --secondary=no, but I guess there still could be some supplementary alignemtns), have you tried any of the other implemented mappers?
If you want more control over the process, I would suggest mapping isoforms outside of SQANTI3, using more stringent parameters or filtering supplementary alignments, and then run the QC script using the recommended GTF input.
Thank you for you prompt reply and suggestion. I think setting secondary=no does not prevent the supplementary alignment. I will try to process them outside SQANTI. Also from my point of view, these should be considered fusion genes.
However, I do see fusion genes in SQANTI3 classification output, but it is always two genes nearby that are chained together. I am also wondering if that should be the appropriate interpretation. To me, they are more likely to be either read-through transcripts or due to overlap of gene annotations. BTW, I use gencode as suggested in your wiki.
I also ran gencode gtf into SQANTI3, and it does classify some transcripts as fusion as a mistake.
The first one looks like a readthrough, the second one is because GLYATL1 (ENST00000534063) and GLYATL1P4 (ENST00000529326) have a shared exon.
I'd like some suggestions about how to understand this.
Hi team,
I have recently run sqanti3 with fasta as input, and the result table contains some duplicate isoforms.
I had a quick check and found it stems from the
corrected.gtf
file first, which seems been generated after aligning with minimap2, the isoform is splitted because of supplement alignment.I did not find much detail about that, could you explain a bit? Does it make sense to consider them separately, because sometimes the dup is far away say in a different chromosome, but sometimes quite close.
I can give an example here:
In same chromosome (430kb apart)
Cross chromosome:
Cheers,
Alex
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: