[594] Surface whether candidate has a one login account on support #10295
+83
−0
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Via support console
dcyoung-dev
approved these changes
Jan 23, 2025
app/components/support_interface/application_summary_component.rb
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
elceebee
approved these changes
Jan 23, 2025
For candidate
avinhurry
deleted the
594-support-console-the-ability-to-determine-if-a-candidate-has-a-one-login-account
branch
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Context
We’re about to go live with One Login. It could be very helpful for Support users to be able to confirm via the support console if a given candidate’s Apply account is associated/linked to a One Login account.
This may aid with support queries.
Changes proposed in this pull request
Surface whether a candidate has a one login account or not using
one_login_auth.present?Guidance to review
Will this work in practice? Is there a better check?