Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Moving POROs out of app/models into app/lib #4704

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Nov 25, 2024
Merged

Conversation

gms-gs
Copy link
Contributor

@gms-gs gms-gs commented Nov 20, 2024

Context

We want to be moving Plain Old Ruby Objects (POROs) out of app/models and into app/lib (or a similar directory like app/services, app/concerns, or app/utils) in our application as it is recommended for better organisation and separation of concerns

Changes proposed in this pull request

  • Move the PORO's from models to the lib directory

Guidance to review

  • Play with the review app and see if anything breaks

@gms-gs gms-gs added the deploy A Review App will be created for PRs with this label label Nov 20, 2024
@gms-gs gms-gs self-assigned this Nov 20, 2024
@gms-gs gms-gs force-pushed the gs/move-poros-to-lib-dir branch from d3f9efc to b8f89e9 Compare November 21, 2024 12:39
@gms-gs gms-gs marked this pull request as ready for review November 21, 2024 12:48
@gms-gs gms-gs requested a review from a team as a code owner November 21, 2024 12:48
@gms-gs gms-gs force-pushed the gs/move-poros-to-lib-dir branch from b8f89e9 to 740fdf6 Compare November 21, 2024 13:50
@gms-gs gms-gs force-pushed the gs/move-poros-to-lib-dir branch from ac93132 to 54d268a Compare November 22, 2024 11:07
@gms-gs gms-gs requested a review from Nitemaeric November 22, 2024 11:07
@gms-gs gms-gs merged commit 3ac4175 into main Nov 25, 2024
19 checks passed
@gms-gs gms-gs deleted the gs/move-poros-to-lib-dir branch November 25, 2024 08:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
deploy A Review App will be created for PRs with this label
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants