Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
ci: fetch main branch when not in a pull request build (#8730)
This pull request fixes main-branch CI failures like [this one](https://github.com/DataDog/dd-trace-py/actions/runs/8362741898/job/22894090313) that resulted from attempting to fetch all of the repo's hundreds of branches and tags during system tests. The root cause is visible [here](https://github.com/DataDog/dd-trace-py/actions/runs/8362741898/job/22894073563) in the "check if run is needed" step. The fix applied in this pull request is to only fetch the `main` branch when running on a merge or schedule, instead of fetching all branches and tags due to an empty pull request hash variable as in the previous behavior. ## Checklist - [x] Change(s) are motivated and described in the PR description - [x] Testing strategy is described if automated tests are not included in the PR - [x] Risks are described (performance impact, potential for breakage, maintainability) - [x] Change is maintainable (easy to change, telemetry, documentation) - [x] [Library release note guidelines](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/releasenotes.html) are followed or label `changelog/no-changelog` is set - [x] Documentation is included (in-code, generated user docs, [public corp docs](https://github.com/DataDog/documentation/)) - [x] Backport labels are set (if [applicable](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting)) - [x] If this PR changes the public interface, I've notified `@DataDog/apm-tees`. - [x] If change touches code that signs or publishes builds or packages, or handles credentials of any kind, I've requested a review from `@DataDog/security-design-and-guidance`. ## Reviewer Checklist - [ ] Title is accurate - [ ] All changes are related to the pull request's stated goal - [ ] Description motivates each change - [ ] Avoids breaking [API](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/stable/versioning.html#interfaces) changes - [ ] Testing strategy adequately addresses listed risks - [ ] Change is maintainable (easy to change, telemetry, documentation) - [ ] Release note makes sense to a user of the library - [ ] Author has acknowledged and discussed the performance implications of this PR as reported in the benchmarks PR comment - [ ] Backport labels are set in a manner that is consistent with the [release branch maintenance policy](https://ddtrace.readthedocs.io/en/latest/contributing.html#backporting)
- Loading branch information