-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 420
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ci: check for benchmark regressions on PRs #12027
Conversation
|
4a5f187
to
78c1715
Compare
Datadog ReportBranch report: ✅ 0 Failed, 130 Passed, 1468 Skipped, 4m 24.48s Total duration (35m 39.2s time saved) |
BenchmarksBenchmark execution time: 2025-01-23 15:50:42 Comparing candidate commit fdfee2c in PR branch Found 0 performance improvements and 0 performance regressions! Performance is the same for 394 metrics, 2 unstable metrics. |
78c1715
to
5bad2db
Compare
df27b2d
to
4628cbb
Compare
Datadog ReportBranch report: ✅ 0 Failed, 130 Passed, 1468 Skipped, 4m 26.52s Total duration (35m 39.39s time saved) |
71962d8
to
3c5e650
Compare
2df4d92
to
f703acc
Compare
APMSP-1689
This PR also needs https://github.com/DataDog/benchmarking-platform/pull/125
After merging we will check and block PRs that introduce a microbenchmark regression of >20%.
Checklist
Reviewer Checklist