Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clean Up Codebase and Start Boulders #1

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: testing
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

peaceheis
Copy link

No description provided.

@peaceheis peaceheis requested a review from a team as a code owner July 31, 2022 23:16
Copy link
Contributor

@woodiertexas woodiertexas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good from my perspective.

Edit: Turns out I accidentally approved the whole PR instead of the version bump edits.

Copy link
Member

@TibiNonEst TibiNonEst left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Aside from the comment I made LGTM

@@ -1,38 +1,5 @@
package io.github.debuggyteam.wonders.util;
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there a reason this file still exists?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm thinking the stuff that used to exist in the utils file got moved or will have a different implementation. Currently this is what exists in the main repo: https://github.com/DebuggyTeam/wonders/blob/1.19/src/main/java/io/github/debuggyteam/wonders/util/WondersUtils.java

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

True, however in that case shouldn't it just be yeeted?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Probably, I'll ask snooze about it on the dev chat since snooze was the one who made the PR.

Copy link
Contributor

@woodiertexas woodiertexas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me despite some stuff being unfinished. Also I'm very late on this.

@woodiertexas woodiertexas changed the base branch from 1.19 to testing December 19, 2022 03:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants