Fix inconsistencies #143
Open
Fix inconsistencies #143
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
* Remove duplicated line to fix Template Record table * Correct the number of DNS records in which the public key is split * Fix formatting for urlControlPanel and nameServers
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Remove duplicated line to fix Template Record table
Currently, the table containing the template record definition is broken because of a duplicate line:
Correct the number of DNS records in which the public key is split
In the
Digitally Sign Requestssection, in the example about breaking down a public key into DNS records, the key is broken down into 3 DNS records but the text says it's broken into 4 recordsFix formatting for urlControlPanel and nameServers
The example used in
DNS Provider Discoverysection has inconsistent formatting leading to a visually broken code snippetFix two typos in the multi-instance section