Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add topic section on local and global dof numbering #1089

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

fredrikekre
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 5, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 93.65%. Comparing base (149cb77) to head (6adb83c).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1089      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   92.69%   93.65%   +0.95%     
==========================================
  Files          39       39              
  Lines        6008     6016       +8     
==========================================
+ Hits         5569     5634      +65     
+ Misses        439      382      -57     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@fredrikekre
Copy link
Member Author

Describe (global) dof renumbering
## Local DoF indices

Locally on each element the DoFs are ordered by field, in the same order they are were added
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this really be documented or is this more akin to devdocs? When do you need to know this?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You kinda need to know this for local assembly? Or do you mean that dof_range is enough?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants