Fix handling of UaStatusCodeError
s in UaProcessor.process_message
#1570
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I noticed that raising a
BadOutOfRangeError
in a server callback set throughServer.subscribe_server_callback
resulted in a BadInternalError on the client side (tested with UaExpert) rather than the expected BadOutOfRange. But raising aServiceError(ua.StatusCodes.BadOutOfRange)
instead would show the the expected BadOutOfRange error in the client.The reason for this idiosyncrasy was that
UaStatusCodeError
s were not explicitly caught. Therefore the "default"except Exception
handler would be used which resulted in aua.StatusCode(ua.StatusCodes.BadInternalError)
to be sent to the client instead of the actual status code of the error that occurred.This commit changes the behavior such that the status code of
UaStatusCodeError
s is respected the same way as it's already done forServiceError
s so that the client correctly receives the status code of theraise
d error.See also #1563 (reply in thread)