Fix UI issues#4726 #4771
Fix UI issues#4726 #4771
Conversation
…nto fix-ui-issues#4726
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces several modifications across multiple components in the codebase. Key changes include updates to styling properties such as Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/components/views/project/ProjectHeader.tsx (1)
Line range hint
80-94: Consider adjusting Title component positioningWith the increased height of ProjectImage and GradientOverlay, it might be beneficial to review the positioning of the Title component. Currently, it's positioned 40px from the bottom:
const Title = styled(H3)` position: absolute; bottom: 40px; left: 40px; // ... other styles `;Consider adjusting this value to maintain the desired visual balance within the taller header. For example, you might want to increase the bottom value to keep the title's relative position consistent with the previous design.
src/components/views/project/projectActionCard/ProjectPublicActions.tsx (1)
152-152: Approved: Color specification improves UI clarityThe addition of the color prop to
IconBookmark16enhances the visual distinction between bookmarked and non-bookmarked states, which aligns with the PR objective of fixing UI issues. This change improves the user interface by providing clearer visual feedback.For better maintainability and consistency, consider using a color variable from your design system instead of a hard-coded hex value. For example:
-<IconBookmark16 color='#525f7f' /> +<IconBookmark16 color={semanticColors.neutral[500]} />This assumes that
semanticColors.neutral[500]corresponds to the desired shade. Adjust the specific color token as needed to match your design system.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (7)
- src/components/badges/ShareLikeBadge.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/components/views/project/ProjectBadges.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/components/views/project/ProjectHeader.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/components/views/project/ProjectIndex.tsx (2 hunks)
- src/components/views/project/projectActionCard/ProjectActionCard.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/components/views/project/projectActionCard/ProjectPublicActions.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/components/views/project/projectActionCard/QFSection.tsx (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- src/components/views/project/ProjectIndex.tsx
Additional comments not posted (4)
src/components/views/project/projectActionCard/ProjectActionCard.tsx (1)
Line range hint
1-85: Verify alignment with PR objectivesThe removal of the "Learn More" link functionality aligns with the PR objective of fixing UI issues. However, please ensure that this change specifically addresses one of the items (1, 2, 3, 4, or 6) mentioned in issue #4726.
To confirm that all intended changes have been implemented, please run the following script:
src/components/views/project/ProjectHeader.tsx (2)
59-59: Approved: Increased ProjectImage height improves visual prominenceThe change from 380px to 430px for the ProjectImage height enhances the visual impact of the project header. This aligns well with the PR objective of fixing UI issues and likely addresses one of the items (1, 2, or 3) from issue #4726.
The use of
object-fit: coverensures that the image will still fill the container appropriately, maintaining the aspect ratio while accommodating various image sizes.
68-68: Approved: GradientOverlay height adjusted for consistencyThe increase in GradientOverlay height from 380px to 430px maintains consistency with the ProjectImage height change. This ensures that the gradient effect covers the entire image area, preserving the visual design intent.
This change is a necessary complement to the ProjectImage modification and contributes to the overall UI improvement targeted by this PR.
src/components/views/project/ProjectBadges.tsx (1)
97-97: Approved margin change, but concerns about other removalsThe increase in
margin-bottomfrom -3px to 24px is a good change that will provide better separation between this component and the next element.However, I have some concerns:
- The removal of
overflow-x: auto;might lead to layout issues if the badges overflow horizontally. Was this intentional?- Removing
padding-top: 24px;will reduce the space above the badges, potentially affecting their vertical alignment. What was the reasoning behind this change?Could you provide more context about the specific UI issues from #4726 that these changes are addressing? This would help in understanding if the modifications fully resolve the intended fixes.
To verify the impact of these changes, please run the following script:
This script will help us understand the context in which ProjectBadges is used and if there are any width constraints or responsive design implementations that might be affected by the removal of
overflow-x: auto;.
| <IconChevronRight16 /> | ||
| </LearnLink> | ||
| </Link> | ||
| <Link href={Routes.Onboarding + '/donors'}></Link> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove the empty Link component
The Link component on line 58 is empty and serves no purpose. This appears to be a remnant from the removal of the "Learn More" link functionality.
Consider removing this line entirely:
-<Link href={Routes.Onboarding + '/donors'}></Link>If there's a specific reason to keep a link to the donors onboarding page, consider adding it elsewhere in the component with proper content and accessibility considerations.
Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <Link href={Routes.Onboarding + '/donors'}></Link> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@lovelgeorge99 can you check why this link is empty? thx
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Seems like the humans are having a chat. I'll hop back into my burrow for now. If you need me again, just tag @coderabbitai in a new comment, and I'll come hopping out!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes i removed the empty link on later commit.
| @@ -138,7 +138,7 @@ const QFSection: FC<IQFSectionProps> = ({ projectData }) => { | |||
| ); | |||
|
|
|||
| return ( | |||
| <DonationSectionWrapper gap={isOnDonatePage ? '8px' : '24px'}> | |||
| <DonationSectionWrapper gap={'8px'}> | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Inconsistent gap values in DonationSectionWrapper
Multiple instances of DonationSectionWrapper use different gap values (24px, 16px, 8px) across the codebase:
src/components/views/project/projectActionCard/DonationSection.tsxusesgap='24px'src/components/views/donate/DonatePageProjectDescription.tsxusesgap='16px'src/components/views/project/projectActionCard/QFSection.tsxusesgap={'8px'}
This inconsistency may lead to uneven spacing in the UI. Additionally, the removal of margin-bottom for the Description component was not detected in the codebase.
Analysis chain
Simplified gap property in DonationSectionWrapper
The gap property in the DonationSectionWrapper component has been simplified from a conditional expression to a fixed value of '8px'. This change ensures consistent spacing across all use cases of the component.
While this change improves consistency, it's important to verify that it doesn't negatively impact the layout in scenarios where a different gap was previously applied. Please run the following script to check for any other occurrences of DonationSectionWrapper with different gap values:
Additionally, the AI summary mentions the removal of a margin-bottom for the Description component, which is not visible in the provided code. To verify this:
Please review the results of these searches to ensure that the changes don't introduce any unintended layout issues.
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other occurrences of DonationSectionWrapper with gap prop
rg --type typescript --type tsx 'DonationSectionWrapper.*gap' src
Length of output: 102
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Description styled component with margin-bottom
rg --type typescript --type tsx 'const Description.*margin-bottom' src
Length of output: 107
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other occurrences of DonationSectionWrapper with gap prop
rg --type ts --type tsx 'DonationSectionWrapper.*gap' src
Length of output: 87
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Description styled component with margin-bottom
rg --type ts --type tsx 'const Description.*margin-bottom' src
Length of output: 92
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other occurrences of DonationSectionWrapper with gap prop in .ts and .tsx files
rg 'DonationSectionWrapper.*gap' --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx' src
Length of output: 371
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Description styled component with margin-bottom in .ts and .tsx files
rg 'const Description.*margin-bottom' --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx' src
Length of output: 72
Issue #4726
made changes for 1,2,3,4,6
i am still working on 5
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Style