Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

HOTFIX: Decentralized Verification feedback #3 #4774

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 24, 2024
Merged

Conversation

mateodaza
Copy link
Member

@mateodaza mateodaza commented Sep 24, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Updated localization for verification status in both Catalan and Spanish to reflect GIVback eligibility.
  • Bug Fixes
    • Adjusted the VerificationBadge component to focus solely on GIVback eligibility, removing previous verification status displays.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Sep 24, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
giveth-dapps-v2 🔄 Building (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Sep 24, 2024 8:25pm

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 24, 2024

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces changes to localization strings in the lang/ca.json and lang/es.json files, updating the label for "verification_status" to reflect a focus on GIVbacks eligibility. Additionally, the VerificationBadge component in src/components/VerificationBadge.tsx has been modified to alter the logic for displaying verification statuses, emphasizing GIVbacks eligibility over general verification.

Changes

File Change Summary
lang/ca.json, lang/es.json Updated label for "verification_status" from "Estat de verificació" / "Estado de verificación" to "Estat d'elegibilitat de GIVbacks" / "Estado de elegibilidad de GIVbacks."
src/components/VerificationBadge.tsx Modified logic to evaluate verificationStatus based on GIVback eligibility, commenting out the display for EVerificationStatus.VERIFIED.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • MohammadPCh

Poem

🐇 In the meadow where we play,
GIVbacks shine bright, leading the way.
Labels shift, meanings align,
Eligibility's the new design!
With a hop and a cheer, we embrace the change,
For a brighter future, we rearrange! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@mateodaza mateodaza merged commit d556de8 into develop Sep 24, 2024
2 of 3 checks passed
@mateodaza mateodaza deleted the devouch-last-fix branch September 24, 2024 20:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: QA
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant