Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Penify]: Setting up Automated AI-Driven Documentation for GitHub! #54

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 3, 2024

Conversation

penify-dev[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@penify-dev penify-dev bot commented Aug 1, 2024


📖 Penify config setup

🚀 Installation

Please merge this Pull Request to see Penify in action! This PR will add a configuration file to your repository, which will enable Penify.dev to generate documentation for your code.


🌍 Introduction

In today's fast-paced software development landscape, the importance of accurate, real-time documentation cannot be overstated.
Yet, the manual effort behind it can be daunting. Enter Penify, the game-changer in automated documentation for your GitHub projects.

🚀 Solution: Penify

Penify.dev is not just a tool; it's your intelligent documentation companion on GitHub.

  • 📲 Easy Installation: Integrate Penify effortlessly with your GitHub organization or specific repo.
  • 🛠️ Automatic Activation: It springs to action right after installation.
  • 🔍 Intelligent Tracking: Keenly monitors merged PRs to the main/master branch, keeping tabs on the freshest of files.
  • 🧠 Smart Generation: Understands your code! Recognizes classes, functions, and generates crisp documentation.
  • 🔄 Intelligent Updates: Updates existing docs in line with recent changes.
  • 📜 Review Before Merge: Gives you the power to review! Creates a PR with updated documentation for your approval.

Let's embrace the future of documentation with Penify.

Description by Korbit AI

Note

This feature is in early access. You can enable or disable it in the Korbit Console.

What change is being made?

Set up an automated AI-driven documentation workflow using Snorkell for the GitHub repository.

Why are these changes being made?

To improve and automate the generation of documentation, ensuring it is always up-to-date and reducing the manual effort required. This approach leverages AI to maintain high-quality documentation, enhancing developer productivity and project maintainability.

Copy link

Review changes with SemanticDiff.

Copy link

korbit-ai bot commented Aug 1, 2024

My review is in progress 📖 - I will have feedback for you in a few minutes!

Copy link

pr-code-reviewer bot commented Aug 1, 2024

👋 Hi there!

Everything looks good!


Automatically generated with the help of gpt-3.5-turbo.
Feedback? Please don't hesitate to drop me an email at [email protected].

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 1, 2024

Important

Review skipped

Bot user detected.

To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior:

  1. .github/workflows/snorkell-auto-documentation.yml:
    • The workflow seems to lack any error handling or fallback mechanisms in case the AI-generated documentation process fails.
    • Storing API keys and client IDs directly in the workflow file can pose a security risk if not properly managed or secured.

Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency:

  1. .github/workflows/snorkell-auto-documentation.yml:
    • Consider adding a try-catch block or error handling mechanism to capture any potential failures during the documentation generation process and give appropriate feedback.
    • Instead of directly using secrets in the workflow file, consider using repository-level or organization-level secrets in GitHub and accessing them using the secrets context, which provides a more secure way to handle sensitive information.

Copy link

senior-dev-bot bot commented Aug 1, 2024

Hi there! 👋 Thanks for opening a PR. It looks like you've already reached the 5 review limit on our Basic Plan for the week. If you still want a review, feel free to upgrade your subscription in the Web App and then reopen the PR

Copy link

instapr bot commented Aug 1, 2024

Feedback:

  • Ensure consistency in spelling: "generEated" should be "generated" in the file.
  • Please add a blank line at the end of the file for better readability.

Copy link

gooroo-dev bot commented Aug 1, 2024

Please double check the following review of the pull request:

Issues counts

🐞Mistake 🤪Typo 🚨Security 🚀Performance 💪Best Practices 📖Readability ❓Others
0 1 0 0 0 0 0

Changes in the diff

  • ➕ New GitHub Actions workflow file created for automated AI-driven documentation.
  • 📖 Added a description of the workflow's purpose in the comments.
  • ➕ Configured the workflow to trigger on pushes to the main branch and manual dispatch.
  • ➕ Defined a job to run the Penify documentation client.

Identified Issues

ID Type Details Severity Confidence
1 🤪Typo The word "genereated" is misspelled in the comment on line 1. 🟡Low 🟡Low
2 🚨Security Secrets used in the workflow should be validated for existence. 🟠Medium 🟡Low

Issue 1

ID: 1
The word "genereated" is misspelled in the comment on line 1 of the file .github/workflows/snorkell-auto-documentation.yml. This can lead to confusion for anyone reading the comment.

Fix:

+# This workflow will improvise current file with AI generated documentation and Create new PR

Explanation: The typo was corrected from "genereated" to "generated" to improve clarity.

Issue 2

ID: 2
The workflow uses secrets (SNORKELL_CLIENT_ID and SNORKELL_API_KEY) without checking if they exist. If these secrets are not set, the workflow will fail without a clear error message.

Fix:

+    - name: Check Secrets
+      run: |
+        if [[ -z "${{ secrets.SNORKELL_CLIENT_ID }}" || -z "${{ secrets.SNORKELL_API_KEY }}" ]]; then
+          echo "Error: Required secrets are not set."
+          exit 1
+        fi

Explanation: Added a step to check for the existence of the required secrets before proceeding with the documentation generation. This will provide a clearer error message if the secrets are not set.

Missing Tests

  • Test for Workflow Execution:

    • Ensure that the workflow triggers correctly on pushes to the main branch.
    • Validate that the workflow can be manually dispatched.
  • Test for Secret Validation:

    • Create a test that simulates the absence of the required secrets and checks that the workflow fails with the appropriate error message.
  • Test for Documentation Generation:

    • Verify that the Penify documentation client runs successfully when provided with valid secrets.

Summon me to re-review when updated! Yours, Gooroo.dev
Feel free to react or reply with your thoughts!

@korbit-ai korbit-ai bot added the korbit-code-analysis Kobit AI code analysis label. label Aug 1, 2024
Copy link

@korbit-ai korbit-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I have reviewed your code and did not find any issues!


Please note that I can make mistakes, and you should still encourage your team to review your code as well.

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 1, 2024

Infisical secrets check: ✅ No secrets leaked!

Scan results:

12:39AM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
12:39AM INF 58 commits scanned.
12:39AM INF scan completed in 286ms
12:39AM INF no leaks found

@gstraccini gstraccini bot requested a review from guibranco August 1, 2024 00:40
@gstraccini gstraccini bot added 🤖 bot Automated processes or integrations 🚦awaiting triage Awaiting triage labels Aug 1, 2024
Copy link

sonarqubecloud bot commented Aug 1, 2024

@guibranco guibranco merged commit bffe0f4 into main Aug 3, 2024
12 checks passed
@guibranco guibranco deleted the penify/config_46148 branch August 3, 2024 00:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🚦awaiting triage Awaiting triage 🤖 bot Automated processes or integrations korbit-code-analysis Kobit AI code analysis label.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant