Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Delete .github/workflows/snorkell-auto-documentation.yml #60

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 21, 2025

Conversation

guibranco
Copy link
Member

@guibranco guibranco commented Jan 21, 2025

πŸ“‘ Description

Delete .github/workflows/snorkell-auto-documentation.yml

βœ… Checks

  • My pull request adheres to the code style of this project
  • My code requires changes to the documentation
  • I have updated the documentation as required
  • All the tests have passed

☒️ Does this introduce a breaking change?

  • Yes
  • No

Summary by Sourcery

CI:

  • Remove the Snorkell auto-documentation workflow.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Removed GitHub Actions workflow for automated documentation generation.

Copy link

Review changes with Β SemanticDiff

Copy link

sourcery-ai bot commented Jan 21, 2025

Reviewer's Guide by Sourcery

This pull request removes the snorkell-auto-documentation.yml workflow file.

No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation.

File-Level Changes

Change Details Files
Removed the auto-documentation workflow.
  • Deleted the snorkell-auto-documentation.yml file.
.github/workflows/snorkell-auto-documentation.yml

Tips and commands

Interacting with Sourcery

  • Trigger a new review: Comment @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
  • Continue discussions: Reply directly to Sourcery's review comments.
  • Generate a GitHub issue from a review comment: Ask Sourcery to create an
    issue from a review comment by replying to it.
  • Generate a pull request title: Write @sourcery-ai anywhere in the pull
    request title to generate a title at any time.
  • Generate a pull request summary: Write @sourcery-ai summary anywhere in
    the pull request body to generate a PR summary at any time. You can also use
    this command to specify where the summary should be inserted.

Customizing Your Experience

Access your dashboard to:

  • Enable or disable review features such as the Sourcery-generated pull request
    summary, the reviewer's guide, and others.
  • Change the review language.
  • Add, remove or edit custom review instructions.
  • Adjust other review settings.

Getting Help

Copy link

pr-code-reviewer bot commented Jan 21, 2025

πŸ‘‹ Hi there!

Everything looks good!


Automatically generated with the help of gpt-3.5-turbo.
Feedback? Please don't hesitate to drop me an email at [email protected].

Copy link

instapr bot commented Jan 21, 2025

Feedback

The deletion of .github/workflows/snorkell-auto-documentation.yml looks good. Thank you for removing the outdated workflow file. Remember not to leave empty lines at the end of files.

Let me know if you need further assistance.

Copy link

Potential issues, bugs, and flaws that can introduce unwanted behavior.

  1. /.github/workflows/snorkell-auto-documentation.yml - The deletion of the entire workflow file means there is no longer any automated process in place for generating documentation. This could lead to inconsistencies in documentation, and a loss of standardization in the project's usage of documentation, especially if this was part of a regular maintenance routine.

Code suggestions and improvements for better exception handling, logic, standardization, and consistency.

  1. /.github/workflows/snorkell-auto-documentation.yml - If this workflow is being removed due to redundancy or inefficacy, ensure there is a clear alternative or revised process for documentation to avoid gaps. If it is planned to be modified rather than removed, consider introducing more robust error handling and logging to the documentation generation process to track issues in real time.

Copy link

gooroo-dev bot commented Jan 21, 2025

Please double check the following review of the pull request:

Issues counts

🐞Mistake πŸ€ͺTypo 🚨Security πŸš€Performance πŸ’ͺBest Practices πŸ“–Readability ❓Others
0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Changes in the diff

  • βž– Removed the GitHub Actions workflow file snorkell-auto-documentation.yml which was responsible for generating AI-based documentation and creating a new PR.

Identified Issues

No issues were identified in the proposed changes as the file was simply deleted.

Explanation

Since the proposed changes involve the deletion of a file, there are no code issues to address or fix. The removal of the file does not introduce any new functionality or require additional testing. The workflow file was responsible for automating documentation tasks, and its removal suggests that this functionality is no longer needed or will be handled differently.

Missing Tests

No tests are required for the deletion of a file. However, if the functionality provided by the deleted workflow is still needed, tests should be created for the new solution or method that replaces this workflow.

Summon me to re-review when updated! Yours, Gooroo.dev
React or reply to give me your feedback!

Copy link

korbit-ai bot commented Jan 21, 2025

I was unable to write a description for this pull request. This could be because I only found files I can't scan.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 21, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request involves the removal of a GitHub Actions workflow file named snorkell-auto-documentation.yml. This workflow was previously configured to automate documentation generation using an AI client on the main branch. The deletion suggests a potential change in the documentation strategy or a shift away from the automated documentation generation approach.

Changes

File Change Summary
.github/workflows/snorkell-auto-documentation.yml Workflow file deleted; previously used AI-powered documentation generation on main branch

Poem

🐰 Farewell, workflow of digital might,
Snorkell's script fades into the night
No more docs by AI's gentle hand
A silent pause in our GitHub land
Documentation's path takes a new flight! πŸš€


πŸ“œ Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

πŸ“₯ Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0825c0f and 926b0be.

πŸ“’ Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/snorkell-auto-documentation.yml (0 hunks)
πŸ’€ Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/snorkell-auto-documentation.yml
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis

πŸͺ§ Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@gstraccini gstraccini bot added the β˜‘οΈ auto-merge Automatic merging of pull requests (gstraccini-bot) label Jan 21, 2025
Copy link

@korbit-ai korbit-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've completed my review and didn't find any issues.

Need a new review? Comment /korbit-review on this PR and I'll review your latest changes.

Korbit Guide: Usage and Customization

Interacting with Korbit

  • You can manually ask Korbit to review your PR using the /korbit-review command in a comment at the root of your PR.
  • You can ask Korbit to generate a new PR description using the /korbit-generate-pr-description command in any comment on your PR.
  • Too many Korbit comments? I can resolve all my comment threads if you use the /korbit-resolve command in any comment on your PR.
  • Chat with Korbit on issues we post by tagging @korbit-ai in your reply.
  • Help train Korbit to improve your reviews by giving a πŸ‘ or πŸ‘Ž on the comments Korbit posts.

Customizing Korbit

  • Check out our docs on how you can make Korbit work best for you and your team.
  • Customize Korbit for your organization through the Korbit Console.

Current Korbit Configuration

General Settings ​
Setting Value
Review Schedule Automatic excluding drafts
Max Issue Count 10
Automatic PR Descriptions βœ…
Issue Categories ​
Category Enabled
Naming βœ…
Database Operations βœ…
Documentation βœ…
Logging βœ…
Error Handling βœ…
Systems and Environment βœ…
Objects and Data Structures βœ…
Readability and Maintainability βœ…
Asynchronous Processing βœ…
Design Patterns βœ…
Third-Party Libraries βœ…
Performance βœ…
Security βœ…
Functionality βœ…

Feedback and Support

Note

Korbit Pro is free for open source projects πŸŽ‰

Looking to add Korbit to your team? Get started with a free 2 week trial here

@gstraccini gstraccini bot requested a review from gstraccini January 21, 2025 00:35
Copy link

@sourcery-ai sourcery-ai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hey @guibranco - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:

Overall Comments:

  • Please clean up the PR description: remove the automated note at the bottom and review the checkbox section - removing a workflow file typically doesn't require documentation updates.
Here's what I looked at during the review
  • 🟒 General issues: all looks good
  • 🟒 Security: all looks good
  • 🟒 Testing: all looks good
  • 🟒 Complexity: all looks good
  • 🟒 Documentation: all looks good

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨
Help me be more useful! Please click πŸ‘ or πŸ‘Ž on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.

Copy link

Infisical secrets check: βœ… No secrets leaked!

Scan results:

A new release of infisical is available: 0.33.1 -> infisical/v0.104.0-postgres

To update, run: sudo apt-get update && sudo apt-get install infisical

12:36AM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
12:36AM INF 66 commits scanned.
12:36AM INF scan completed in 275ms
12:36AM INF no leaks found

Copy link

gstraccini bot commented Jan 21, 2025

This pull request is ready βœ… for merge/squash.

@guibranco guibranco merged commit f57adbc into main Jan 21, 2025
20 checks passed
@guibranco guibranco deleted the guibranco-patch-1 branch January 21, 2025 01:17
Copy link

korbit-ai bot commented Jan 21, 2025

I was unable to write a description for this pull request. This could be because I only found files I can't scan.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
β˜‘οΈ auto-merge Automatic merging of pull requests (gstraccini-bot)
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants