The package bayesRecon
implements several methods for probabilistic
reconciliation of hierarchical time series forecasts.
The main functions are:
reconc_gaussian
: reconciliation via conditioning of multivariate Gaussian base forecasts; this is done analytically;reconc_BUIS
: reconciliation via conditioning of any probabilistic forecast via importance sampling; this is the recommended option for non-Gaussian base forecasts;reconc_MCMC
: reconciliation via conditioning of discrete probabilistic forecasts via Markov Chain Monte Carlo;reconc_MixCond
: reconciliation via conditioning of mixed hierarchies, where the upper forecasts are multivariate Gaussian and the bottom forecasts are discrete distributions;reconc_TDcond
: reconciliation via top-down conditioning of mixed hierarchies, where the upper forecasts are multivariate Gaussian and the bottom forecasts are discrete distributions.
💥 [2024-05-29] Added reconc_MixCond
and reconc_TDcond
and the
vignette “Reconciliation of M5 hierarchy with mixed-type forecasts”.
💥 [2023-12-19] Added the vignette “Properties of the reconciled distribution via conditioning”.
💥 [2023-08-23] Added the vignette “Probabilistic Reconciliation
via Conditioning with bayesRecon”. Added the schaferStrimmer_cov
function.
💥 [2023-05-26] bayesRecon v0.1.0 is released!
You can install the stable version on R CRAN
install.packages("bayesRecon", dependencies = TRUE)
You can also install the development version from Github
# install.packages("devtools")
devtools::install_github("IDSIA/bayesRecon", build_vignettes = TRUE, dependencies = TRUE)
Let us consider the minimal temporal hierarchy in the figure, where the
bottom variables are the two 6-monthly forecasts and the upper variable
is the yearly forecast. We denote the variables for the two semesters
and the year by
The hierarchy is described by the aggregation matrix A, which can be
obtained using the function get_reconc_matrices
.
library(bayesRecon)
rec_mat <- get_reconc_matrices(agg_levels = c(1, 2), h = 2)
A <- rec_mat$A
print(A)
#> [,1] [,2]
#> [1,] 1 1
We assume that the base forecasts are Poisson distributed, with
parameters given by
lambdaS1 <- 2
lambdaS2 <- 4
lambdaY <- 9
lambdas <- c(lambdaY, lambdaS1, lambdaS2)
n_tot = length(lambdas)
base_forecasts = list()
for (i in 1:n_tot) {
base_forecasts[[i]] = list(lambda = lambdas[i])
}
We recommend using the BUIS algorithm (Zambon et al., 2024) to sample from the reconciled distribution.
buis <- reconc_BUIS(
A,
base_forecasts,
in_type = "params",
distr = "poisson",
num_samples = 100000,
seed = 42
)
samples_buis <- buis$reconciled_samples
Since there is a positive incoherence in the forecasts
(
reconciled_forecast_S1 <- buis$bottom_reconciled_samples[1,]
range_forecats <- range(reconciled_forecast_S1)
hist(
reconciled_forecast_S1,
breaks = seq(range_forecats[1] - 0.5, range_forecats[2] + 0.5),
freq = F,
xlab = "S_1",
ylab = NULL,
main = "base vs reconciled"
)
points(
seq(range_forecats[1], range_forecats[2]),
stats::dpois(seq(range_forecats[1], range_forecats[2]), lambda =
lambdaS1),
pch = 16,
col = 4,
cex = 2
)
The blue circles represent the probability mass function of a Poisson
with parameter
Moreover, while the base bottom forecast were assumed independent, the
operation of reconciliation introduced a negative correlation between
AA <-
xyTable(buis$bottom_reconciled_samples[1, ],
buis$bottom_reconciled_samples[2, ])
plot(
AA$x ,
AA$y ,
cex = AA$number * 0.001 ,
pch = 16 ,
col = rgb(0, 0, 1, 0.4) ,
xlab = "S_1" ,
ylab = "S_2" ,
xlim = range(buis$bottom_reconciled_samples[1, ]) ,
ylim = range(buis$bottom_reconciled_samples[2, ])
)
We also provide a function for sampling using Markov Chain Monte Carlo (Corani et al., 2023).
mcmc = reconc_MCMC(
A,
base_forecasts,
distr = "poisson",
num_samples = 30000,
seed = 42
)
samples_mcmc <- mcmc$reconciled_samples
We now assume that the base forecasts are Gaussian distributed, with parameters given by
-
$\mu_{Y} = 9$ ,$\mu_{S_1} = 2$ , and$\mu_{S_2} = 4$ ; -
$\sigma_{Y} = 2$ ,$\sigma_{S_1} = 2$ , and$\sigma_{S_2} = 3$ .
muS1 <- 2
muS2 <- 4
muY <- 9
mus <- c(muY, muS1, muS2)
sigmaS1 <- 2
sigmaS2 <- 2
sigmaY <- 3
sigmas <- c(sigmaY, sigmaS1, sigmaS2)
base_forecasts = list()
for (i in 1:n_tot) {
base_forecasts[[i]] = list(mean = mus[[i]], sd = sigmas[[i]])
}
We use the BUIS algorithm to sample from the reconciled distribution:
buis <- reconc_BUIS(
A,
base_forecasts,
in_type = "params",
distr = "gaussian",
num_samples = 100000,
seed = 42
)
samples_buis <- buis$reconciled_samples
buis_means <- rowMeans(samples_buis)
If the base forecasts are Gaussian, the reconciled distribution is still Gaussian and can be computed in closed form:
Sigma <- diag(sigmas ^ 2) #transform into covariance matrix
analytic_rec <- reconc_gaussian(A,
base_forecasts.mu = mus,
base_forecasts.Sigma = Sigma)
analytic_means_bottom <- analytic_rec$bottom_reconciled_mean
analytic_means_upper <- A %*% analytic_means_bottom
analytic_means <- rbind(analytic_means_upper,analytic_means_bottom)
The base means of
The reconciled means obtained analytically are 7.41, 2.71, 4.71, while the reconciled means obtained via BUIS are 7.41, 2.71, 4.71.
Corani, G., Azzimonti, D., Augusto, J.P.S.C., Zaffalon, M. (2021). Probabilistic Reconciliation of Hierarchical Forecast via Bayes’ Rule. ECML PKDD 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 12459. DOI
Corani, G., Azzimonti, D., Rubattu, N. (2024). Probabilistic reconciliation of count time series. International Journal of Forecasting 40 (2), 457-469. DOI
Zambon, L., Azzimonti, D. & Corani, G. (2024). Efficient probabilistic reconciliation of forecasts for real-valued and count time series. Statistics and Computing 34 (1), 21. DOI
Zambon, L., Agosto, A., Giudici, P., Corani, G. (2024). Properties of the reconciled distributions for Gaussian and count forecasts. International Journal of Forecasting (in press). DOI
Zambon, L., Azzimonti, D., Rubattu, N., Corani, G. (2024). Probabilistic reconciliation of mixed-type hierarchical time series. The 40th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, accepted.
Dario Azzimonti (Maintainer) [email protected] |
Nicolò Rubattu [email protected] |
Lorenzo Zambon [email protected] |
Giorgio Corani [email protected] |
If you encounter a clear bug, please file a minimal reproducible example on GitHub.