Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Release 1.4.1 (#322)
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
* Publication 1.4.1 Updates

See log for integration of 1.4.0 review period updates.  Editorial changes (typos, style corrections, etc.).

* Updated release date
  • Loading branch information
ToddCooper authored Oct 11, 2024
1 parent 01df095 commit c166523
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Showing 4 changed files with 15 additions and 5 deletions.
10 changes: 10 additions & 0 deletions CHANGELOG.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -15,6 +15,16 @@ Each section shall contain a list of action items of the following format: `<bri

## [Unreleased]

## [1.4.1] - 2024-10-04

### Editorial Fixes

- IHE Publications Editor review corrections - typos and style corrections ([#319](https://github.com/IHE/DEV.SDPi/pull/319))
- Unclarities and typos in TF-1:A.1 ([#316](https://github.com/IHE/DEV.SDPi/issues/316))

### Added
- No additions

## [1.4.0] - 2024-09-17

### Editorial Fixes
Expand Down
4 changes: 2 additions & 2 deletions asciidoc/sdpi-supplement.adoc
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -20,11 +20,11 @@
:sdpi_milestone_publication: SDPi 1.4 Publication
:sdpi_milestone_review: SDPi 1.4 Review

:ihe_supplement_sdpi_revision: 1.4.0
:ihe_supplement_sdpi_revision: 1.4.1
:ihe_supplement_sdpi_revision_short: 1.4
:ihe_supplement_sdpi_revision_date: {localdatetime}
:ihe_supplement_sdpi_revision_label: Standard for Trial Use / Implementation
:ihe_supplement_sdpi_publication_month: September 17, 2024
:ihe_supplement_sdpi_publication_month: October 7, 2024
:ihe_supplement_sdpi_public_comment_submission_deadline: N/A

{empty} +
Expand Down
6 changes: 3 additions & 3 deletions asciidoc/volume1/tf1-ch-a-requirements-interoperability.adoc
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -34,17 +34,17 @@ In order to manage this diversity and wealth of specifications and standards, th
[#hanging_gardens_framework]
image::../images/vol1-diagram-hanging-gardens.svg[]

Though a full explanation of the this framework is beyond this discussion footnote:hanging_gardens_framework_article[A more detailed explanation of this model is provided on the https://confluence.hl7.org/x/4ijxB[IHE-HL7 Gemini _Hanging Gardens Framework_ confluence page].
Though a full explanation of the framework is beyond this discussion footnote:hanging_gardens_framework_article[A more detailed explanation of this model is provided on the https://confluence.hl7.org/x/4ijxB[IHE-HL7 Gemini _Hanging Gardens Framework_ confluence page].
Last accessed 2022.10.04.], some general observations will help understand the value and use of the framework:

. Real-world Requirements are at the top -- use case requirements, detailing clinical system functions ensure that all requirements and capabilities are rooted in the purposes that technology users are advancing, namely to provide safe;
. Real-world Requirements are at the top -- use case-based requirements that detail clinical system function scenarios, ensuring that all requirements and capabilities in the specifications are rooted in the healthcare purposes that technology *_users_* are expecting to be supported: effectively, safely and securely;
. Each layer or "garden" and contained specification(s) define - implicitly or explicitly - how they integrate with other layers: _*capabilities*_ that are provided (to meet the needs of other layers), and _*requirements*_ (needed capabilities) for other layers and implementations;
. Standards are sometimes grouped into families (e.g., ISO/IEEE 11073 SDC) - this indicates that they are internally cohesive as well as able to be integrated as a group with other areas;
. _*Vertical*_ groupings on the left indicate standards that apply to all of the _*horizontal*_ layers in the core of the model;
. Profile standards, such as the SDPi+FHIR, generally integrate specifications through the layers from the top to the bottom similar, with each layer contributing to those below and converging in a single interface capability bundle;
. Physical layers are leveraged, not re-invented, which is why there is no color in the bottom layer;
. _*Requirements interoperability*_ is achieved by tracing "profile lines" from top to bottom, integrating requirements from one layer's specification to the capabilities provided by another layer;
. Requirement TYPEs are rooted in the layers that they represent and link type definitions to their use in this specification; see <<vol1_clause_sdpi_requirements_core_model>> Section below.>.
. Requirement TYPEs are rooted in the layers that they represent and link type definitions to their use in this specification; see <<vol1_clause_sdpi_requirements_core_model>> Section below.

NOTE: The implementation of this high-level framework will be extended as the specifications and tooling mature.

Expand Down

0 comments on commit c166523

Please sign in to comment.