Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

A more precise type for Nary.inject #1399

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Feb 19, 2025
Merged

A more precise type for Nary.inject #1399

merged 3 commits into from
Feb 19, 2025

Conversation

nfrisby
Copy link
Contributor

@nfrisby nfrisby commented Feb 19, 2025

See the commit message of consensus: a more precise type for Nary.inject; the other commits are superficial.

Copy link
Member

@amesgen amesgen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@nfrisby nfrisby force-pushed the nfrisby/simplify-inject branch from 121ea51 to 29328d5 Compare February 19, 2025 15:20
@nfrisby
Copy link
Contributor Author

nfrisby commented Feb 19, 2025

I rebased because I had forgot to sign some commits.

@nfrisby nfrisby enabled auto-merge February 19, 2025 15:20
@nfrisby nfrisby disabled auto-merge February 19, 2025 15:21
The new type no longer requires the caller to specify when eras _after_ their
given `Index` begin. This interface makes it obvious that the `Inject` logic
does not depend on such `Bound`s.
@nfrisby nfrisby force-pushed the nfrisby/simplify-inject branch from 29328d5 to 9db14f8 Compare February 19, 2025 15:22
@nfrisby
Copy link
Contributor Author

nfrisby commented Feb 19, 2025

And again because I forgot to squash the commit that fixed the warning CI caught

@nfrisby nfrisby enabled auto-merge February 19, 2025 15:22
@nfrisby nfrisby added this pull request to the merge queue Feb 19, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit b14da83 Feb 19, 2025
13 of 14 checks passed
@nfrisby nfrisby deleted the nfrisby/simplify-inject branch February 19, 2025 15:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
technical debt Technical debt
Projects
Status: ✅ Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants