-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
EraTransitionGovernance.md: first draft #1408
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
a8ebdfd
to
2561a35
Compare
@sgillespie @johnalotoski @mkoura I've drafted a document here in this PR that provides the top-level advice for how to increment the major protocol version with each era, and when doing so will cause a transition to the next era. Would you review it? In particular, I'd like to know which aspects of the process (of introducing the right transactions at the right time instead of Edit: also some of you already have concrete experience getting these transactions to work, so please suggest any knowledge you already have that should be added to this document. EG something about making it as simple/easy as possible to arrange for the necessary transactions' fees. |
240a112
to
c74a21e
Compare
I added a section that explains the |
c74a21e
to
c556ca2
Compare
d73c538
to
561910d
Compare
And another section that links to and summaries the Byron, Shelley...Babbage, and/or Conway governance demonstrated by a few key test suites. This is now the first full draft of the document. |
561910d
to
1f8a833
Compare
1f8a833
to
3d3d778
Compare
This document is intended to help teams implement testnets without relying on
TestXxxHardForkAtEpoch
, ie as a step towards the latest plan for Issue 416.