Comparing model runs with different ECS values #24
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Closed
|
@ptrscll, what sort of conclusions can you draw from this plot? Would it be helpful to include S as one of the calibration parameters? |
|
I think this plot indicates that changing ECS can have a pretty substantial effect on temperature predictions, which makes me think that it would be helpful to try including it as a calibration parameter. |
|
Let's give it a try! |
|
@ptrscll, could you do a similar analysis of changing ocean heat diffusivity over a somewhat large range? While keeping S fixed at 3? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I tried changing ECS values within the IPCC range of 2-5. At the moment, I have a spaghetti plot with all the temperature and CO2 results, but I also plan on making a plot showing the difference between the new runs and the run with the baseline ECS of 3.