update cuboid_screw_thread

CHANGELOG.md

@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ and this project adheres to [Semantic Versioning](https://semver.org/spec/v2.0.0
 - Thumbnails now showcase the polycube labeling
 - `in-volume_twist` is more parametric and reoriented (to be seen from +Z)
 - `in-volume_knot` is redesigned (smaller margins) and more parametric
+- `cuboid_screw_thread` is reoriented (to be seen from +Z)
 
 ## [1.0.0] - 2023-09-08
 

README.md

@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ For STL files I used the default relative deflection of 0.0001.
 
 Name | Thumbnail | Files | Comments
 -----|-----------|-------|---------
-`cuboid_screw_thread` | <img src="cuboid_screw_thread/thumbnail.png" width="300"/> | [.hdf](cuboid_screw_thread/SALOME_Study.hdf) <br/> [.py](cuboid_screw_thread/SALOME_Shaper.py) <br/> [.step](cuboid_screw_thread/CAD.step) <br/> [.brep](cuboid_screw_thread/CAD.brep) <br/> [.stl](cuboid_screw_thread/CAD.stl) | Introduced in [^2] and mentioned in appendices of [^3]. <br/> Labeling-based approaches [^1][^3] will collapse the two parts of the slope, constrained to the same top and bottom planes.
+`cuboid_screw_thread` | <div align="center"><img src="cuboid_screw_thread/thumbnail.png" width="300"/><br/><a href="https://3dviewer.net/#model=https://github.com/LIHPC-Computational-Geometry/nightmare_of_polycubes/blob/main/cuboid_screw_thread/labeled_mesh.glb" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">3D viewer ↗</a></div> | [.hdf](cuboid_screw_thread/SALOME_Study.hdf) <br/> [.py](cuboid_screw_thread/SALOME_Shaper.py) <br/> [.step](cuboid_screw_thread/CAD.step) <br/> [.brep](cuboid_screw_thread/CAD.brep) <br/> [.stl](cuboid_screw_thread/CAD.stl) <br/> [.obj](cuboid_screw_thread/triangle_mesh.obj) | Introduced in [^2] and mentioned in appendices of [^3]. <br/> Labeling-based approaches [^1][^3] will collapse the two parts of the slope, constrained to the same top and bottom planes.
 `cuboid_torus_with_step` | <img src="cuboid_torus_with_step/thumbnail.png" width="300"/> | [.hdf](cuboid_torus_with_step/SALOME_Study.hdf) <br/> [.py](cuboid_torus_with_step/SALOME_Shaper.py) <br/> [.step](cuboid_torus_with_step/CAD.step) <br/> [.brep](cuboid_torus_with_step/CAD.brep) <br/> [.stl](cuboid_torus_with_step/CAD.stl) | Introduced in [^2] I believe. <br/> Here too labeling-based approaches [^1][^3] will not detect any invalidity and crush the step into the z-axis plane.
 `in-volume_twist` | <div align="center"><img src="in-volume_twist/thumbnail.png" width="300"/><br/><a href="https://3dviewer.net/#model=https://github.com/LIHPC-Computational-Geometry/nightmare_of_polycubes/blob/main/in-volume_twist/labeled_mesh.glb" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">3D viewer ↗</a></div> | [.hdf](in-volume_twist/SALOME_Study.hdf) <br/> [.py](in-volume_twist/SALOME_Shaper.py) <br/> [.step](in-volume_twist/CAD.step) <br/> [.brep](in-volume_twist/CAD.brep) <br/> [.stl](in-volume_twist/CAD.stl) <br/> [.obj](in-volume_twist/triangle_mesh.obj) | Introduced in [^4] <br/> Labeling-based approaches [^1][^3] will not detect the twist. The slits prevent hex-mesh extraction algorithms from un-twisting the through-hole and pushing all distorsion towards the left and right faces.
 `in-volume_knot` | <div align="center"><img src="in-volume_knot/thumbnail.png" width="300"/><br/><a href="https://3dviewer.net/#model=https://github.com/LIHPC-Computational-Geometry/nightmare_of_polycubes/blob/main/in-volume_knot/labeled_mesh.glb" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">3D viewer ↗</a></div> | [.hdf](in-volume_knot/SALOME_Study.hdf) <br/> [.py](in-volume_knot/SALOME_Shaper.py) <br/> [.step](in-volume_knot/CAD.step) <br/> [.brep](in-volume_knot/CAD.brep) <br/> [.stl](in-volume_knot/CAD.stl) <br/> [.obj](in-volume_knot/triangle_mesh.obj) | Similar to the previous model, but the through-hole is twisting around itself.