-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixed issue where certain subpackages were not getting populated in the getEvent response #218
Fixed issue where certain subpackages were not getting populated in the getEvent response #218
Conversation
…//github.com/LabKey/snd into 23.11_fb_fixImproperHandlingOfEmptyEventData
? nextLevelEventDataSuperPkgs.get(eventData.getEventId()).values().stream().map(SuperPackage::getSuperPkgId).toList() | ||
: new ArrayList<>(); | ||
|
||
AtomicInteger emptyEventDataId = new AtomicInteger(0); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can i please know if we are using any multithreads in here as i do see AtomicInteger? i checked in the sndManager code and i don't see any threads being used in this file.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No, but in order to iterate an Integer object within a stream it needs to be Atomic
No description provided.