Skip to content

Proof that reordering of constructors is correct (#1095) #2822

Proof that reordering of constructors is correct (#1095)

Proof that reordering of constructors is correct (#1095) #2822

Triggered via push July 22, 2024 14:13
Status Success
Total duration 34m 18s
Artifacts

build.yml

on: push
checktodos
3s
checktodos
Matrix: build
Fit to window
Zoom out
Zoom in

Annotations

40 warnings
build (8.19, 4.14-flambda, opam)
Overwriting previous delimiting key B in scope bool_scope
build (8.19, 4.14-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ * _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.19, 4.14-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ <-> _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.19, 4.14-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ + _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.19, 4.14-flambda, opam)
Unused introduction pattern: ?
build (8.19, 4.14-flambda, opam)
Unused introduction pattern: ?
build (8.19, 4.14-flambda, opam)
Unused introduction pattern: ?
build (8.19, 4.14-flambda, opam)
Unused introduction pattern: ?
build (8.19, 4.14-flambda, opam)
The following logical axioms were
build (8.19, 4.14-flambda, opam)
The record Point could not be defined as a primitive record.
build (8.19, 4.14-flambda, local)
Overwriting previous delimiting key B in scope bool_scope
build (8.19, 4.14-flambda, local)
Notation "_ * _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.19, 4.14-flambda, local)
Notation "_ <-> _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.19, 4.14-flambda, local)
Notation "_ + _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.19, 4.14-flambda, local)
Unused introduction pattern: ?
build (8.19, 4.14-flambda, local)
Unused introduction pattern: ?
build (8.19, 4.14-flambda, local)
Unused introduction pattern: ?
build (8.19, 4.14-flambda, local)
Unused introduction pattern: ?
build (8.19, 4.14-flambda, local)
The following logical axioms were
build (8.19, 4.14-flambda, local)
The following logical axioms were
build (8.19, 4.09-flambda, opam)
Overwriting previous delimiting key B in scope bool_scope
build (8.19, 4.09-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ * _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.19, 4.09-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ <-> _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.19, 4.09-flambda, opam)
Notation "_ + _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.19, 4.09-flambda, opam)
Unused introduction pattern: ?
build (8.19, 4.09-flambda, opam)
Unused introduction pattern: ?
build (8.19, 4.09-flambda, opam)
Unused introduction pattern: ?
build (8.19, 4.09-flambda, opam)
Unused introduction pattern: ?
build (8.19, 4.09-flambda, opam)
The following logical axioms were
build (8.19, 4.09-flambda, opam)
The record Point could not be defined as a primitive record.
build (8.19, 4.09-flambda, local)
Overwriting previous delimiting key B in scope bool_scope
build (8.19, 4.09-flambda, local)
Notation "_ * _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.19, 4.09-flambda, local)
Notation "_ <-> _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.19, 4.09-flambda, local)
Notation "_ + _" was already used in scope type_scope.
build (8.19, 4.09-flambda, local)
Unused introduction pattern: ?
build (8.19, 4.09-flambda, local)
Unused introduction pattern: ?
build (8.19, 4.09-flambda, local)
Unused introduction pattern: ?
build (8.19, 4.09-flambda, local)
Unused introduction pattern: ?
build (8.19, 4.09-flambda, local)
The following logical axioms were
build (8.19, 4.09-flambda, local)
The following logical axioms were