Tabular template for multiple term requests

.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/new-multiple-term-request-issue-template.md

@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
+---
+name: New multiple term request issue template
+about: Please use this template to request one or multiple new terms for the ontology
+title: "[NTR]"
+labels: New Term Request
+assignees: ''
+
+---
+
+For new term requests (NTRs), please provide the following information:
+
+| Preferred term label | Synonyms | Textual definition | Link to [CHARISMA Wiki equivalent] | Suggested parent term | Axiomatization | Examples | Remarks |
+| -------------------- | -------- | ------------------ | ---------------------------------- | --------------------- | -------------- | -------- | ------- |
+|                      |          | [definition1]      |                                    |                       |                |          | [note1] |
+
+
+[definition1]: ## "You may use this syntax for lengthy sentences, in order to maintain the code of the table legible. This applies specially to definitions and remarks. The text becomes visible upon hovering the mouse pointer over the placeholder text."
+
+[note1]: ## "..."
+
+
+
+
+## Preferred term label
+
+(e.g., spectral window range maximum)
+
+## Synonyms
+
+(e.g., acquisition band maximum)
+
+## Textual definition
+
+The definition should be understandable even for non-specialists. Include a DOI or URL to refer to any relevant publication that provides additional information about the suggested term.
+
+## Link to [CHARISMA Wiki equivalent]
+The CHARISMA project wiki contains terms for Raman specific and related concepts identified by domain experts of the CHARISMA team. In order to reuse this expertise, we've agreed with the CHARISMA team to link between the terms in this wiki and the terms in VISBO. For example https://wiki.charisma.ideaconsult.net/wiki/Item:Q57 is mentioned as definition source for the VIBSO class *region of interest*.
+
+## Suggested parent term
+
+Please look in the hierarchy in a browser such as the [NFDI4Chem TS](https://terminology.nfdi4chem.de/ts/ontologies/vibso)
+
+## Examples
+
+Please provide a more detailed description that examplifies how the term is supposed to be used, in terms of what it is suppose to repesent (e.g. a concept or a relation).
+
+## Attribution
+
+If you would like a nanoattribution, please indicate your ORCID id. (out of the table)
+
+[CHARISMA Wiki equivalent]: https://wiki.charisma.ideaconsult.net/wiki/List_of_all_terms
+

docs/competency_questions.md

@@ -9,12 +9,17 @@ As previously mentioned, VIBSO's scope is the semantic description of vibrationa
  * What kind of vibrational spectroscopy was performed (as detailed as possible: enhanced, resonant, stimulated, coherent, anti-Stokes...)?
 
  * In what context was it performed, e.g. as part of what study or investigation?
+> Requires to clarify the hierarchy in the ontology: e.g. experiment < investigation < project
+
+ ~* What protocol and devices were used?~
+> Somehow redundant with the following one; "what protocol" meaningful only within a workgroup
 
  * What devices were used?
 
  * What were the protocol parameters & device configurations?
 
  * Who was involved in the assay? (identified by a PID like ORCID at best)
+ > It is more probable that the users document the names of the co-authors than the academic degree / role
 
  * What was the assayed sample, including its relevant attributes (e.g. substrate, production procedure, pre-treatment)?
 
@@ -30,4 +35,4 @@ As previously mentioned, VIBSO's scope is the semantic description of vibrationa
 
 * Find me a suitable solvent which is compatible with sample XY, i.e. which does not have any Raman peak or band between wavenumbers W1 and W2.
 
-This list represents only a first draft and needs to be thoroughly discussed with the domain experts and the NFDI4Chem community. 
+This list represents only a first draft and needs to be thoroughly discussed with the domain experts and the NFDI4Chem community.