Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[16.0][FIX] account_payment_partner: Fallback to load CoA #1427

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: 16.0
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

victoralmau
Copy link
Member

Since odoo/odoo@d0342c8, the default existing company is not getting a CoA automatically, provoking than the current tests fail with the error:

odoo.exceptions.UserError: No journal could be found in company My Company (San Francisco) for any of those types: sale

Thus, we put tests post-install for being sure localization modules are installed, the same as AccountTestInvoicingCommon does, but we don't inherit from it, as it creates an overhead creating 2 new companies and loading their CoA and some more stuff, while we don't need all of that.

Besides, if you don't have l10n_generic_coa installed, you can't use another CoA (like l10n_es) easily, so we put little code to select the first available CoA.

@Tecnativa

Since odoo/odoo@d0342c8, the default existing company is not getting a
CoA automatically, provoking than the current tests fail with the error:

odoo.exceptions.UserError: No journal could be found in company My Company (San Francisco) for any of those types: sale

Thus, we put tests post-install for being sure localization modules are
installed, the same as AccountTestInvoicingCommon does, but we don't
inherit from it, as it creates an overhead creating 2 new companies and
loading their CoA and some more stuff, while we don't need all of that.

Besides, if you don't have `l10n_generic_coa` installed, you can't use
another CoA (like `l10n_es`) easily, so we put little code to select the
first available CoA.
Copy link

@luisDIXMIT luisDIXMIT left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM!

@pedrobaeza pedrobaeza added this to the 16.0 milestone Feb 26, 2025
@pedrobaeza
Copy link
Member

@victoralmau
Copy link
Member Author

Right now I'm not sure, I think it's because main_company is checked instead of cls.env.company (in that case I would change the previously existing code instead of repeating it), I'll leave the PR in draft and I'll comment with the conclusion.

@victoralmau victoralmau marked this pull request as draft February 26, 2025 17:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants