Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[17.0] [MIG] stock_production_lot_traceability: Migration to 17.0 #1638

Open
wants to merge 12 commits into
base: 17.0
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

rven
Copy link

@rven rven commented Jun 26, 2024

No description provided.

@rven rven mentioned this pull request Jun 26, 2024
67 tasks
@pedrobaeza
Copy link
Member

Shouldn't this be renamed to stock_lot_traceability?

/ocabot migration stock_production_lot_traceability

@OCA-git-bot OCA-git-bot added this to the 17.0 milestone Jun 26, 2024
@rven rven force-pushed the 17.0-mig-stock_production_lot_traceability branch 2 times, most recently from cbeff84 to b0ccf3d Compare June 27, 2024 13:05
@rven rven force-pushed the 17.0-mig-stock_production_lot_traceability branch from b0ccf3d to 2ea91bb Compare June 27, 2024 13:06
Copy link

There hasn't been any activity on this pull request in the past 4 months, so it has been marked as stale and it will be closed automatically if no further activity occurs in the next 30 days.
If you want this PR to never become stale, please ask a PSC member to apply the "no stale" label.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the stale PR/Issue without recent activity, it'll be soon closed automatically. label Dec 22, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot closed this Jan 26, 2025
@rven
Copy link
Author

rven commented Jan 27, 2025

@rousseldenis Can you re-open this PR and add the no stale label?

@rousseldenis rousseldenis reopened this Jan 27, 2025
@rousseldenis
Copy link
Contributor

@rven Could you attend @pedrobaeza comment ?

@rousseldenis rousseldenis added no stale Use this label to prevent the automated stale action from closing this PR/Issue. and removed stale PR/Issue without recent activity, it'll be soon closed automatically. labels Jan 27, 2025
@rven
Copy link
Author

rven commented Jan 27, 2025

@rven Could you attend @pedrobaeza comment ?

@rousseldenis The module is already renamed???

@rousseldenis
Copy link
Contributor

Ooops didn't see. Great!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
migration needs review no stale Use this label to prevent the automated stale action from closing this PR/Issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants