Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

First shot at code style stuff #77

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

uberlinuxguy
Copy link
Member

This is a first start at some code style stuff, until we codify something. Probably want a README update too.

@uberlinuxguy
Copy link
Member Author

References #75

.editorconifg Show resolved Hide resolved
.editorconifg Show resolved Hide resolved
.gitattributes Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
.gitattributes Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@slime73
Copy link
Member

slime73 commented Nov 23, 2021

I just wanna test this out locally (later today hopefully) to make sure it doesn't cause any unexpected issues for me

.gitattributes Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@uberlinuxguy
Copy link
Member Author

Are we good to merge this as a starting point?

@slime73
Copy link
Member

slime73 commented Dec 8, 2021

Go ahead and merge it IMO, if we run into any issues we can figure things out from there

@tribad
Copy link
Contributor

tribad commented Dec 8, 2021

Why not use end_of_line = auto
?

Comment on lines +6 to +8
# Unix-style newlines with a newline ending every file
[*]
end_of_line = lf
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
# Unix-style newlines with a newline ending every file
[*]
end_of_line = lf

Remove local enforcement of line endings in favor of enforcing what goes into the repo via .gitattributes

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants