Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove unnecessary mention of ServicePulse #106

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Feb 4, 2025
Merged

Remove unnecessary mention of ServicePulse #106

merged 10 commits into from
Feb 4, 2025

Conversation

udidahan
Copy link
Member

@udidahan udidahan commented Feb 2, 2025

As we don't want people to focus on names like ServicePulse or ServiceControl unnecessarily, preferring to keep the focus on the Service Platform.

@udidahan udidahan changed the title Remove mention of ServicePulse Remove unnecessary mention of ServicePulse Feb 2, 2025
README.md Show resolved Hide resolved
@@ -6,10 +6,11 @@ This showcase consists of 4 processes hosting MassTransit message producers and

## Launching the Showcase in Docker

The showcase requires a connection to a broker (by default RabbitMQ), [ServiceControl](https://hub.docker.com/r/particular/servicecontrol) container, [ServicePulse](https://hub.docker.com/r/particular/servicepulse) container and the [MassTransit Connector for ServiceControl](https://hub.docker.com/r/particular/servicecontrol-masstransit-connector) container.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

My opinion is that we still need this list of required containers, so that if someone is having an error in the showcase they can see what is in docker and understand what each container is there for

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree, but I think if we put that under the docs, that would probably be a better place for them. I can't see a good enough reason to keep them this prominent on the Readme.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I put them under the troubleshooting section now.

@udidahan udidahan merged commit 81b97a3 into main Feb 4, 2025
2 checks passed
@udidahan udidahan deleted the udidahan-patch-1 branch February 4, 2025 07:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants