Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade Byte Buddy 1.16.1 -> 1.17.0 #1535

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 1, 2025
Merged

Conversation

Picnic-DevPla-Bot
Copy link
Contributor

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
Byte Buddy (source) compile minor 1.16.1 -> 1.17.0

Release Notes

raphw/byte-buddy (Byte Buddy)

v1.17.0

  • Assure that implicit choice for class reader and class writer are always symmetric with regard to internal representation.
  • Retrofit MemberSubstitution to also allow for intercepting invokedynamic instructions.
  • Introduce @Handle annotations to allow for injecting constant pool-stored method handle in Advice, MemberSubstitution and MethodDelegation.
  • Introduce @DynamicConstant annotations to allow for injecting constant pool-stored dynamic constants in Advice, MemberSubstitution and MethodDelegation.

  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

@Picnic-DevPla-Bot
Copy link
Contributor Author

Picnic-DevPla-Bot commented Jan 31, 2025

Suggested commit message:

Upgrade Byte Buddy 1.16.1 -> 1.17.0 (#1535)

See:
- https://github.com/raphw/byte-buddy/releases/tag/byte-buddy-1.17.0
- https://github.com/raphw/byte-buddy/compare/byte-buddy-1.16.1...byte-buddy-1.17.0

Copy link

Looks good. No mutations were possible for these changes.
Mutation testing report by Pitest. Review any surviving mutants by inspecting the line comments under Files changed.

@Stephan202 Stephan202 added this to the 0.20.0 milestone Jan 31, 2025
@rickie rickie merged commit 9088369 into master Feb 1, 2025
16 checks passed
@rickie rickie deleted the renovate/byte-buddy-1.x branch February 1, 2025 15:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants