from polymerelements to PolymerElements in 1.x #244
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
LGTM, it still makes sense to merge this on master 👌 Will resolve the conflicts in the 2.0-preview branch after this is merged |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This pull requests want to make this Polymer element consistent with the majority of other Polymer elements. The uppercase version "PolymerElements" is closer to real name of the github project name, like presented in the git URL.
The use of mixed case does not seem to have an effect on bower and JavaScript projects. But other languages like Java are more picky and would benefit from consistency.
@valdrinkoshi asked me if I can make a pull request for the 1.x branch now in the request for 2.0-preview branch #243
This pull request is a manual follow up of PolymerLabs/tedium#47 and PolymerLabs/tedium#48 which try to do this in an automated way, but are stuck.