Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FOUR-21949 there are problems running tests in the SettingCacheTest file #8038

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 18, 2025

Conversation

devmiguelangel
Copy link
Contributor

@devmiguelangel devmiguelangel commented Feb 14, 2025

Issue & Reproduction Steps

There are problems running tests in the SettingCacheTest file

Solution

Related Tickets & Packages

FOUR-21949

Code Review Checklist

  • I have pulled this code locally and tested it on my instance, along with any associated packages.
  • This code adheres to ProcessMaker Coding Guidelines.
  • This code includes a unit test or an E2E test that tests its functionality, or is covered by an existing test.
  • This solution fixes the bug reported in the original ticket.
  • This solution does not alter the expected output of a component in a way that would break existing Processes.
  • This solution does not implement any breaking changes that would invalidate documentation or cause existing Processes to fail.
  • This solution has been tested with enterprise packages that rely on its functionality and does not introduce bugs in those packages.
  • This code does not duplicate functionality that already exists in the framework or in ProcessMaker.
  • This ticket conforms to the PRD associated with this part of ProcessMaker.

@devmiguelangel devmiguelangel self-assigned this Feb 14, 2025
Copy link

Quality Gate passed Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
No data about Coverage
No data about Duplication

See analysis details on SonarQube

@ryancooley ryancooley merged commit f80e2e0 into release-2025-winter Feb 18, 2025
9 of 13 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants