This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 18, 2022. It is now read-only.
TestConnection struct #56
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@tbmreza I'll take a look asap - we're about releasing the v2 of Qovery - Until then, I will not be available. |
|
I give up working on this approach. To conclude what I started, though, I'll change this to a simple refactor pull request. |
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
My follow-up to #55. I ended up implementing a different approach. When writing the example in that issue, I didn't know that you can't annotate the type of vector of closures.
I believe this draft PR is concrete enough to express my idea. What's left is to write current test cases in new format (as rstest attributes).