Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

First Review Changes - Part 2 #16

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 15, 2024
Merged

First Review Changes - Part 2 #16

merged 2 commits into from
Feb 15, 2024

Conversation

Robadob
Copy link
Member

@Robadob Robadob commented Feb 13, 2024

  • index.md
    • Replace/remove badge (removed, not enough capacity to sort this and it's low priority)
  • optimisation-introduction.md
    • Could an applied example/exercise be created to hammer home premature optimisation? Code that goes faster but makes no sense. (This could be examples away from software development, e.g. structuring a startup so that it can scale to millions of customers before it has even one.)
    • Simple pytest exercise? e.g. cover edge cases
    • Can we explain CPython/C/Python bytecode here? It gets mentioned in the following episode with no context.
  • data-structures.md
    • Feels very long now, generator functions feels weak could be removed? (also remove from intro/conclusion)
    • This section could wrap an exercise proposing some hypothetical situations, what's the appropriate data structure/algorithm?
  • uptodate.md
    • is there a recommended way to update/find latest supported python version/packages?
  • memory.md
    • Now that numpy comes first, may be able to build a working example for variable access
  • opt-conclusion.md
    • complete keypoints
    • Refer to further reading

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Feb 13, 2024

Thank you!

Thank you for your pull request 😃

🤖 This automated message can help you check the rendered files in your submission for clarity. If you have any questions, please feel free to open an issue in {sandpaper}.

If you have files that automatically render output (e.g. R Markdown), then you should check for the following:

  • 🎯 correct output
  • 🖼️ correct figures
  • ❓ new warnings
  • ‼️ new errors

Rendered Changes

🔍 Inspect the changes: https://github.com/RSE-Sheffield/pando-python/compare/md-outputs..md-outputs-PR-16

The following changes were observed in the rendered markdown documents:

 index.md                        |  4 ++++
 md5sum.txt                      |  8 ++++----
 optimisation-conclusion.md      | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
 optimisation-introduction.md    | 13 +++++++------
 optimisation-minimise-python.md |  2 +-
 5 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
What does this mean?

If you have source files that require output and figures to be generated (e.g. R Markdown), then it is important to make sure the generated figures and output are reproducible.

This output provides a way for you to inspect the output in a diff-friendly manner so that it's easy to see the changes that occur due to new software versions or randomisation.

⏱️ Updated at 2024-02-13 13:32:04 +0000

github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2024
Not currently enough capacity to redesign this properly, low priority.
update optimisation intro/conclusion keypoints.
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 13, 2024
@Robadob Robadob marked this pull request as ready for review February 15, 2024 09:07
@Robadob Robadob merged commit 3968309 into main Feb 15, 2024
3 checks passed
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 15, 2024
Auto-generated via {sandpaper}
Source  : 3968309
Branch  : main
Author  : Robert Chisholm <[email protected]>
Time    : 2024-02-15 09:07:38 +0000
Message : First Review Changes - Part 2 (#16)
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 15, 2024
Auto-generated via {sandpaper}
Source  : 67c2ac9
Branch  : md-outputs
Author  : GitHub Actions <[email protected]>
Time    : 2024-02-15 09:08:57 +0000
Message : markdown source builds

Auto-generated via {sandpaper}
Source  : 3968309
Branch  : main
Author  : Robert Chisholm <[email protected]>
Time    : 2024-02-15 09:07:38 +0000
Message : First Review Changes - Part 2 (#16)
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 20, 2024
Auto-generated via {sandpaper}
Source  : 67c2ac9
Branch  : md-outputs
Author  : GitHub Actions <[email protected]>
Time    : 2024-02-15 09:08:57 +0000
Message : markdown source builds

Auto-generated via {sandpaper}
Source  : 3968309
Branch  : main
Author  : Robert Chisholm <[email protected]>
Time    : 2024-02-15 09:07:38 +0000
Message : First Review Changes - Part 2 (#16)
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 27, 2024
Auto-generated via {sandpaper}
Source  : 67c2ac9
Branch  : md-outputs
Author  : GitHub Actions <[email protected]>
Time    : 2024-02-15 09:08:57 +0000
Message : markdown source builds

Auto-generated via {sandpaper}
Source  : 3968309
Branch  : main
Author  : Robert Chisholm <[email protected]>
Time    : 2024-02-15 09:07:38 +0000
Message : First Review Changes - Part 2 (#16)
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 5, 2024
Auto-generated via {sandpaper}
Source  : 67c2ac9
Branch  : md-outputs
Author  : GitHub Actions <[email protected]>
Time    : 2024-02-15 09:08:57 +0000
Message : markdown source builds

Auto-generated via {sandpaper}
Source  : 3968309
Branch  : main
Author  : Robert Chisholm <[email protected]>
Time    : 2024-02-15 09:07:38 +0000
Message : First Review Changes - Part 2 (#16)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant