Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding unsafe #28

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Mar 8, 2024
Merged

Adding unsafe #28

merged 4 commits into from
Mar 8, 2024

Conversation

bergel
Copy link
Collaborator

@bergel bergel commented Mar 7, 2024

No description provided.

@bergel bergel added the build:lint Run the static analyzer Lint on the files modified in this PR label Mar 7, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 7, 2024

Static code analyzer report

Output of the StaticLint.jl code analyzer
Report creation time (UTC): (2024-03-08T10:10:59.711)

  • Line 174, column 12: It is preferable to use tin(item,collection) instead of the Julia's in. at offset 6230 of raicode/src/linting/checks.jl
  • Line 310, column 10: It is preferable to use tin(item,collection) instead of the Julia's in. at offset 10984 of raicode/src/linting/checks.jl
  • Line 631, column 12: It is preferable to use tin(item,collection) instead of the Julia's in. at offset 23018 of raicode/src/linting/checks.jl
  • Line 735, column 8: It is preferable to use thaskey(dict,key) instead of the Julia's haskey. at offset 27478 of raicode/src/linting/checks.jl
  • Line 881, column 42: It is preferable to use tin(item,collection) instead of the Julia's in. at offset 33330 of raicode/src/linting/checks.jl
  • Line 887, column 8: It is preferable to use tin(item,collection) instead of the Julia's in. at offset 33580 of raicode/src/linting/checks.jl
  • Line 887, column 63: It is preferable to use tin(item,collection) instead of the Julia's in. at offset 33635 of raicode/src/linting/checks.jl
  • Line 990, column 99: It is preferable to use tin(item,collection) instead of the Julia's in. at offset 38438 of raicode/src/linting/checks.jl
  • Line 1108, column 61: It is preferable to use thaskey(dict,key) instead of the Julia's haskey. at offset 42064 of raicode/src/linting/checks.jl
  • Line 1141, column 33: It is preferable to use thaskey(dict,key) instead of the Julia's haskey. at offset 42718 of raicode/src/linting/checks.jl
  • Line 6, column 37: It is preferable to use tin(item,collection) instead of the Julia's in. at offset 266 of raicode/src/linting/extended_checks.jl
  • Line 152, column 5: It is preferable to use thaskey(dict,key) instead of the Julia's haskey. at offset 5914 of raicode/src/linting/extended_checks.jl
  • Line 207, column 5: It is preferable to use thaskey(dict,key) instead of the Julia's haskey. at offset 8641 of raicode/src/linting/extended_checks.jl
  • Line 245, column 5: It is preferable to use thaskey(dict,key) instead of the Julia's haskey. at offset 10058 of raicode/src/linting/extended_checks.jl
    🚨In total, 14 errors are found over 3 Julia files🚨

@bergel bergel merged commit 851d10b into main Mar 8, 2024
5 of 11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
build:lint Run the static analyzer Lint on the files modified in this PR
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant