This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 7, 2021. It is now read-only.
Unicode tables (changes requested to #42) #47
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Added tables that directly uses Unicode characters. Useful for outputting outputs that do not support terminal control characters.
So can be imported in the same way as the other table types; as requested in Robpol86#42.
As requested in Robpol86#42.
| @@ -0,0 +1,69 @@ | |||
| """Tables using unicode box drawing characters defined here.""" | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
You may want to add a line like
# coding: utf8
to the top of this file
and then probably a
from __future__ import unicode_literals for py27 happiness
|
I didn't check the pull requests and I developed a very similar solution myself and submitted it as a pull request. |
Open
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR makes the changes requested to the original PR by @legendre6891 in #42, to hopefully try and make this mergeable. Thanks!